AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Melissa Myers

MATH200 · MATH230 · MATH360 · MATH011 · MATH10 · MATH021 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
64/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
83.33%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you can keep up with homework and ask for help, but .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring when askedLots of homeworkFlexible attendanceMixed claritySoft deadlines
  • Students often find her caring and .
  • Homework and .
  • Online experiences are sharply mixed, including one very negative review about lack of instruction and response.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

66/100

Grades are , and homework points, but repeated heavy homework keeps the A from being effortless.

Online evidence is split between soft deadlines and confusing projects, while in-person evidence .

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

Some students call the work simple or easy, but math anxiety, confusing topics, and .

Online reviews conflict more strongly, while students who attend and ask questions.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

85/100

, though students still recommend going to learn the material.

In-person reviews clearly support optional attendance, while online reviews .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

and fair, but the negative online and clarity complaints lower confidence.

, while online reviews are divided between supportive and strongly negative experiences.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

Soft deadlines, retakes, partial credit, , and assignment passes suggest .

Format shift

Online reviews mention soft deadlines, while in-person reviews , and .

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and projects as the main workload issue.

Format shift

Both formats mention heavy project or concern most often.

Teaching experience

Average

68/100

She is often described as patient and helpful, but some students report , and poor online support.

Format shift

, while online feedback includes one severe complaint about lack of teaching and response.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

, and midterms or finals rather than one single assessment type.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize projects and tests, while , and finals.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly positive about her patience and help, but and occasional confusion are common complaints.

Main concern

There is a lot of homework, and weaker math students may need extra help.

What students said

“ and actually takes the time to teach everything.”
MATH200
“ and easy going, but there is alot of homework and .”
MATH360

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

one says the work is simple with soft deadlines, while another says the and support is poor.

Main concern

Online students if communication is weak.

What students said

“She has soft deadlines so you can turn things in on your own time.”
MATH011
“ of "projects" that make no sense because she doesn't teach”
MATH10

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

some student-friendly grading support, but reviews do not clearly prove proctoring or open-book rules.

Few TestsTest RetakesPartial CreditTwo Midterms And Final

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe few , and a final, but do not clearly prove open-book or proctoring policy.

Few TestsPartial CreditTest RetakesTwo Midterms And Final
“ !”
MATH230
“ and a final.”
MATH360

Online

Online reviews mention test heaviness but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book rules, or .

Test Heavy
“Only thing that was time consuming were the learned”
MATH011

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is very willing to help you when you need .”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

68/100

“Very sweet, and patient.”

📚 Workload Pressure

32/100

“ and easy going, but there is alot of homework and .”

⚖️

76/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and actually takes the time to teach everything.
  • She is very willing to help you when you need .
  • Rude, boring and .

Theme 2

📈 And Grades

  • DO THE HOMEWORK!!
  • , so do it and u should be fine.
  • .

Theme 3

💻 About Online Experience

  • She has soft deadlines so you can turn things in on your own time.
  • of "projects" that make no sense because she doesn't teach

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Sixteen reviews provide a long time span and repeated themes, though older reviews and mixed opinions reduce precision.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 55
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH3606 reviews
MATH2305 reviews
104811 review
MATH0111 review
MATH0211 review
Show 2 more courses
MATH101 review
MATH2001 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1