AI Rate Professor

English

Ryan Cook

ENGL2 · ENG002 · ENGL002 · ENGL20387 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
73/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
71.43%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you want an engaging writing class and are willing .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHelpful feedbackEssay heavyEngaging topicsParticipation mattersMixed grading standards
  • In-person students usually praise him as engaging, funny, and .
  • The course is essay-centered, and students say a strong grade requires real writing effort.
  • The single online review is negative and describes a and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

61/100

Passing is realistic if students attend and submit work, but earning an A and consistent effort.

In-person reviews say effort and feedback can pay off, while the .

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The class has interesting topics and light smaller work, but essays and writing expectations create a real challenge.

In-person students describe a fair but , while the online review focuses on a and grading frustration.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

42/100

Attendance and participation are repeatedly tied to passing and making the class manageable.

In-person evidence clearly recommends showing up, while online .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

, and meaningful discussions, but one online review and tough grading concerns prevent a top score.

In-person recommendations are strong, while the only online review is a .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

Students say and clear criteria, but and one online student calls him a tough grader.

Format shift

, while online evidence suggests stricter or inconsistent grading standards.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

There are , and three major essays, but students often call the smaller work light.

Format shift

and participation, while online workload evidence is limited to the timed final and .

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Most students describe him as charismatic, helpful, funny, and thought-provoking, though the online review is sharply negative.

Format shift

, while the single online review reports a poor experience.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

34/100

Grades are mainly writing-based, with , and only limited exam evidence.

Format shift

and writing tasks, while online evidence mentions a .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are , and interesting topics, while noting essays require effort.

Main concern

, so weak writing effort can limit the .

What students said

“WORK HARD ON YOUR ESSAYS (3), they're a huge part of your grade.”
ENGL002
“ and response to small writes.”
ENGL2

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only online review is negative, citing a , and poor interaction.

Main concern

and timed assessment may feel stricter than expected.

What students said

“Gave 15 minutes for a 20 question final.”
ENG002
“ .”
ENG002

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is limited and mixed, with one online timed final complaint and .

Timed Online FinalEssay Heavy GradingQuizzes

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and , but do not clearly prove midterm, final, proctoring, or open-book exam policy.

QuizzesEssay Heavy Grading
“Grade is determined by homework 20%, papers 60%, quizzes 10%, and activities 10%.”
ENG002

Online

The only online review says the final was 20 questions in 15 minutes, but does not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

Timed Online Final
“Gave 15 minutes for a 20 question final.”
ENG002

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“One of thought provoking and enjoyable.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“He is charismatic and funny, but also straight to the .”

✍️ Essay Challenge

61/100

“I really had to work for an A, but the .”

⚠️ Online Risk

45/100

“Gave 15 minutes for a 20 question final.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is charismatic and funny, but also straight to the .
  • Makes your work and thoughts feel like it matters
  • He helps you understand and he genuinely cares!

Theme 2

✍️ About Essays And Grades

  • WORK HARD ON YOUR ESSAYS (3), they're a huge part of your grade.
  • Only 3 essays which isnt bad at all.
  • I really had to work for an A, but the .

Theme 3

💻 About Online Experience

  • Gave 15 minutes for a 20 question final.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Seven reviews are detailed and recent enough, but the small online sample creates uncertainty about format-specific patterns.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG0023 reviews
ENGL0022 reviews
ENGL21 review
ENGL203871 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 1 · A- 1

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values