AI Rate Professor

Sociology

David Caddell

SOC043 · SOC001 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
60%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you are comfortable studying independently and can handle inconsistent online organization.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring teacherInconsistent communicationHard testsUnorganized onlineInteresting lectures
  • Reviews are sharply mixed, with some students calling him caring and excellent and others warning against taking him online.
  • Online concerns focus on , and few point opportunities.
  • The single in-person-coded review actually describes a COVID transition to online and is very positive.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Students can do fine by studying and taking notes, but , and unclear instructions raise the cost of an A.

Online reviews carry most evidence and are mixed, while the and helpful support.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The sociology content is manageable with notes and studying, but some students say and poorly aligned.

Online reviews show both interesting lectures and , while the but limited.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews mention participation matters once, but they do not clearly prove a .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

Recommendation depends heavily on tolerance for online disorganization because praise for care and lectures is balanced by strong complaints.

Online reviews are divided, while the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

42/100

Few point opportunities, hard tests, and .

Format shift

Strictness concerns come from online reviews; the single in-person-counted .

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Workload is not described as huge, but studying, tests from lectures and textbooks, and .

Format shift

Online evidence drives the workload judgment, with little in-person workload detail.

Teaching experience

Average

66/100

Students praise his care and lectures, but communication gaps and organization problems sharply reduce the experience.

Format shift

Online teaching reviews are polarized, while the .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Reviews repeatedly center on tests and .

Format shift

; the in-person-counted review gives little assessment detail.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The but describes a class that transitioned online during COVID.

Main concern

Only one review exists, so this format has limited reliability.

What students said

“he was really great with the transition.”
SOC001
“He was a and very helpful .”
SOC001

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are polarized, praising his care and lectures but , and .

Main concern

Tests and .

What students said

“ and come from both the textbooks and lectures.”
SOC043
“HE IS THE AND WENT MIA FOR TWO WEEKS”
SOC043
“ and assignments.”
SOC043

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and , but reviews do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, or final format.

Tests From Textbook And LecturesHard TestsUnclear Test Instructions

Assessment risk

Standard

43/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The single in-person-counted review does not clearly .

Online

Online reviews say tests are important, hard, and sometimes unclear, but do not clearly prove .

Tests From Textbook And LecturesHard TestsUnclear Test Instructions
“ and come from both the textbooks and lectures.”
SOC043
“ SO HARD AND MAKE NO SENSE”
SOC043
“ and assignments.”
SOC043

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“DON'T GET . HE IS THE AND WENT MIA FOR TWO WEEKS AND DIDN'T EVEN TELL US IF WE HAD A .”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

66/100

“He's really committed to his students and helping anyway he can.”

⚠️ Online Organization

42/100

“A nice guy, but .”

🧪 Test Difficulty

43/100

“ SO HARD AND MAKE NO SENSE AND DONT CORRELATE WITH WHAT YOU'RE LEARNING.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He's really great!
  • ! Lectures are interesting and hes such a caring person.
  • He was a and very helpful .

Theme 2

⚠️ About Communication & Organization

  • HE IS THE AND WENT MIA FOR TWO WEEKS
  • A nice guy, but .
  • and assignments.

Theme 3

📈

  • and come from both the textbooks and lectures.
  • Honestly if you study and .
  • He does not give many opportunities for

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Five reviews provide useful detail and , but the sample is small and one format label conflicts with the comment context.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

SOC0433 reviews
SOC0012 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values