AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Cher Chang

MATH200 · COS200 · MATH360 · MATH021 · MATH21 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
55/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
57.14%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

Take Chang if you are comfortable doing regular homework and asking questions, but if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardLots of homeworkMixed teaching qualityHelpful when askedTest heavyAccent concerns
  • Student experiences are sharply mixed, with and others calling the teaching poor or discouraging.
  • and in-person reviews.
  • Grades can be manageable for students who keep up, but struggling students may feel unsupported.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Grades can be good when students do the homework, but the workload and mixed support keep it from being an easy A.

Online evidence suggests easier grading, while struggle.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Some students find the class relatively easy, but , and difficult math expectations.

The lone online review is more positive and flexible, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

58/100

Recorded online meetings make attendance flexible, but and participation often matter.

Online attendance is flexible through recorded Zooms, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

57/100

Recommendations are split because while others feel unsupported or overwhelmed.

The online review recommends him, while comments.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

One online student says he grades easily, but and workload complaints.

Format shift

Online grading sounds lenient, while student preparedness.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Many reviews mention lots of homework, class work, online homework, and lecture-heavy sessions.

Format shift

, though in-person reviews describe the burden more negatively.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Students and complaints that he teaches poorly or makes questions feel unwelcome.

Format shift

Online teaching is described as clear, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Reviews mention homework, class work, quizzes, and every course.

Format shift

Online evidence emphasizes homework, while , and tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and serious complaints about workload, discouraging responses, and unclear communication.

Main concern

Students who struggle may find the workload and support style frustrating.

What students said

“he would make me feel stupid”
MATH021
“he is very good at explaining the content.”
COS200
“ ”
MATH21

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review is positive, describing clear , and .

Main concern

The online course still has a good amount of homework.

What students said

“All the zooms are recorded so you dont have to attend the live meeting unless you have questions.”
MATH021
“Each unit you get a good amonut of homework but he grades pretty easily.”
MATH021

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests and homework, but they do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, closed-book, midterm, or .

Tests MentionedHomework Based UnitsNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but they do not clearly prove exam book policy, proctoring, midterm format, or .

Tests MentionedTest Heavy
“I passed and I never studied for the tests.”
COS200
“Ridiculous work load, so , and lecture takes all class.”
MATH021

Online

The but does not clearly prove quiz, exam, webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, midterm, or .

No Clear Exam Policy Evidence

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Not a bad guy, he is very good at explaining the content.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, support, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

Teaching Quality

58/100

“Not a bad guy, he is very good at explaining the content.”

Workload Load

35/100

“Ridiculous work load, so , and lecture takes all class.”

Recommendation Split

57/100

“ .”

Theme 1

About Teaching Style

  • and he answers any questions and goes through the problems if you ask.
  • he is very good at explaining the content.

Theme 2

About Workload and Grades

  • Each unit you get a good amonut of homework but he grades pretty easily.
  • Relatively easy class. As long as .
  • Ridiculous work load, so , and lecture takes all class.

Theme 3

About Student Support

  • he would make me feel stupid
  • Willing to go over problems again if needed.
  • don't be afraid to ask questions if you don't understand something, he does reexplain.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

76/100

Evidence confidence

Ten reviews across multiple years provide useful patterns, but opinions are highly mixed and several are vague.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

COS2005 reviews
MATH0212 reviews
MATH2001 review
MATH211 review
MATH3601 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 2 · A 1 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

2

C 1 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1