AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Sadeh Shirin

PHYS055 · ASTRO10 · PHYS55 · MATH230 · PHYS021 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
23/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
44.44%
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

Avoid unless you are strong in math or physics and can self-manage a tough, fast-paced class.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderConfusing explanationsFast pacedAttendance mattersMixed support
  • Most negative reviews describe confusing instruction, public shaming, and overcomplicated material.
  • Positive reviews , and available outside class.
  • Getting a good grade appears possible but , and handling difficult tests.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

A grades are possible, but students , and a need to do many practice problems.

The online review is very hard and negative, while with heavy effort.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Students repeatedly say she overcomplicates simple material, moves fast, and makes lessons hard to understand.

Both formats suggest difficulty, but the and confusing explanations.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

One in-person review but because a lot is covered.

, while the online review only tags that skipping hurts performance.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

Most students would not recommend her because of , and .

The lone online , while but mostly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Multiple reviews and tags call her a , though can help attentive students.

Format shift

Strict grading appears in both formats, with detailed , and .

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Students mention lots of , and difficult tests.

Format shift

The online review is lecture-heavy, while , and test prep.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Positive comments praise help and clarity, but , and public shaming.

Format shift

Online , while and strongly polarized.

Assessment method

Balanced

63/100

Assessment is described , and .

Format shift

In-person reviews give the assessment details, while the online review only mentions work and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, but the dominant concern is confusing, fast-paced teaching with .

Main concern

Many students say she overcomplicates lessons and calls students out publicly.

What students said

“Makes simple things over complicated and shames students publicly.”
PHYS021
“One word, Horrific.”
MATH230
“Attendance isn't mandatory, but day.”
MATH230

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review is , and a lack of useful support.

Main concern

as rude and unhelpful.

What students said

“I would not recommend her to anyone, to be honest, .”
ASTRO10
“ .”
ASTRO10

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention difficult tests and quizzes but .

Difficult TestsQuizzesLabsExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and difficult tests, but do not clearly prove book or .

Difficult TestsQuizzesLabs
“ , and exams.”
PHYS055
“ so do all the problems in the book.”
PHYS055

Online

The online review does not clearly .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Makes simple things over complicated and shames students publicly.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“Makes simple things over complicated and shames students publicly.”

📈 Grade Effort

34/100

“ so do all the problems in the book.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

32/100

“I would not recommend her to anyone, to be honest, .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Makes simple things over complicated and shames students publicly.
  • She moves on with her lessons even though all of her students dont know what she is teaching.
  • She cannot speak in proper sentences so its difficult to understand what she is trying to say.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • so do all the problems in the book.
  • . So you don't actually need the book.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • Always willing to help during her office hours.
  • she's very to the point and never wants to see her students fail.
  • , and exams.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven reviews across several years provide , and teaching style despite some polarization.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 57

Course coverage

MATH2307 reviews
ASTRO101 review
PHYS0211 review
PHYS0551 review
PHYS551 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

2

B+ 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

2

Audit/No Grade 1 · Not sure yet 1