AI Rate Professor

English

Megan Baptista

ENGL20363 · ENGL24684 · ENG001 · ENG102 · ENG002 · ENGL14583 · ENG251 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
49/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

if you can handle heavy writing and participation while .

Best fit · Effort For RewardHeavy writing workloadGood feedback when engagedLate gradingParticipation mattersCommunication issues
  • Reviews are split between and supportive and students who felt ignored.
  • The workload is consistently writing-heavy, with lots of , and participation.
  • A grades are possible with steady work, but and create real grade risk.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

A grades are reachable when students participate and meet deadlines, but heavy work and .

Online reviews provide most A evidence, while + and a withdrawal.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The content is manageable for prepared students, but the , and deadlines add challenge.

Online reviews emphasize workload pressure, while and excessive work.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Participation matters repeatedly appears, so engagement seems important even when attendance rules are not clearly stated.

Participation evidence is mostly online, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Students recommend her when they value structure and feedback, but communication and .

Online reviews are mixed, and the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Students report , and plagiarism accusations, despite some clear criteria praise.

Format shift

, while in-person evidence is split.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Multiple reviews cite lots of , and excessive work.

Format shift

The heavy workload appears in both formats, especially online.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

, and supportive, but several students report poor communication and .

Format shift

Online teaching is mixed with more negative detail, while and one strong negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Assessment , and few tests.

Format shift

Online reviews provide most assessment evidence, and and feedback.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

negative communication complaint and one strong praise for clear expectations and conferences.

Main concern

Communication and in-person review.

What students said

“ .”
ENG001
“She is specific on what she expects in the class.”
ENG251

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mixed, with some praising organization and feedback while others complain , and poor responses.

Main concern

and to improve.

What students said

“As long as you participate daily and !”
ENG002
“She would grade papers after new papers were due and .”
ENGL24684
“She assigned so much irrelevant busy work.”
ENG102

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention a final, a midterm, and few tests, but .

Final MentionedMidterm MentionedFew TestsExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book status, or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Online reviews mention a final and , but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, open-book, or Lockdown Browser rules.

Final MentionedMidterm MentionedFew Tests
“Some questions on the - they were either cut off of missing text.”
ENG102
“Waited until the end of the .”
ENGL14583
“Tests? Not many”
ENGL14583

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“As long as you participate daily and !”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“She is specific on what she expects in the class.”

📚 Workload Pressure

24/100

“She assigned so much irrelevant busy work.”

⚖️

35/100

“She would grade papers after new papers were due and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and specific!
  • She is thorough on giving information in each subject.
  • shes cares, listens, and and I had her online class.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • As long as you participate daily and !
  • She assigned so much irrelevant busy work.
  • She would grade papers after new papers were due and .

Theme 3

💬 About Communication

  • I asked about my grade to know where I was at and never received a reply.
  • .
  • She schedules conferences with her students throughout the semester in order to touch base and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Eight reviews across online and in-person formats provide detailed but , and communication.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ENG0022 reviews
ENG0011 review
ENG1021 review
ENG2511 review
ENGL145831 review
Show 2 more courses
ENGL203631 review
ENGL246841 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 2 · A 1

B range

1

B- 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1