AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Carol Enns

PHIL01 · ETHC5 · PHIL25 · PHIL001 · 24838PHIL20 · PHIL120 · PHI05 · PHIL1 · PHIL1PHIL12 · PHIL005 · PHILOSOPHY001 · PHIL020PHIL001 · PHILO001 · ETHICPHIL · PHIL020 · PHIL025 · PHIL012 · PHIL5 · PHILOSOPHY · PHILPHIL · PHIL05 · 81 lifetime ratings

AI rating
65/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
90%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

Take Carol Enns if you want a demanding, discussion-heavy philosophy class and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerThought ProvokingTough GraderMandatory ParticipationPolarizing StyleCaring If You Engage
  • Students consistently say the class is challenging and not an easy A.
  • Many students found her life-changing and intellectually valuable, while others found her rude or confusing.
  • Success depends heavily on attendance, preparation, participation, and office-hour help.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

An A is possible, but students repeatedly , and accepting tough grading.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

The course pushes critical thinking, abstract reading, and philosophical writing, .

All course-difficulty evidence is from in-person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

Attendance and participation are repeatedly described as essential, and several students say skipping class leads to failure or falling behind.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

, but the recommendation is limited by repeated complaints about harshness and confusion.

Recommendations .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Students , and few easy paths to raise grades.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

34/100

, and constant preparation.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

68/100

Her teaching is intellectually powerful for engaged students but inconsistent because many students report confusion or discomfort.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Assessment appears to , and tests rather than relying on one format.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews describe a demanding, polarizing instructor who can be inspiring for prepared students but frustrating for those wanting clarity and flexibility.

Main concern

Students often struggle with , and a blunt classroom style.

What students said

“it has become the most impactful and useful class I have ever taken, hands down.”
PHIL01
“This class isn't a walk in the park.”
PHIL001
“ As and got C's in her class.”
PHIL5

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests, quizzes, essays, and participation, but they do not clearly prove open-book rules, proctoring, or .

Weekly TestsQuizzesEssay-Based AssessmentParticipation Grading

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a final, but do not clearly prove the exact exam rules.

Weekly TestsQuizzesWritten FinalEssay-Based Assessment
“ ”
PHIL020
“She made sure the lectures matched with the exams and quizzes.”
PHIL020PHIL001
“Fill in the blank essays and marked down grades for not talking”
PHIL5

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This class isn't a walk in the park. and effort but I promise you will get so much out of it.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and classroom tone. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

68/100

“She really pushes you to think and view things differently.”

⚖️

32/100

“ As and got C's in her class.”

👍 Recommendation Fit

72/100

“I because you WILL learn something and although it's not an easy A, .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She asks a lot of questions which forces you to think and learn the concepts better.
  • She really pushes you to think and view things differently.
  • She goes off topic so much.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Not an easy A but likely not to fail.
  • This class isn't a walk in the park.
  • The average scores of my peers were C's and very few A's.

Theme 3

❤️ About Classroom Experience

  • Love her. She really does care about you
  • She honestly puts my classmates down and is condescending to them on more than one occasions
  • This course, as well as Carol, helped me grow as a student and a person.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

81

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is credible because it uses 50 detailed in-person reviews across many years with consistent themes despite polarized opinions.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 521
4 out of 522
3 out of 510
2 out of 59
1 out of 519

Course coverage

PHIL00110 reviews
PHIL17 reviews
PHIL055 reviews
PHIL55 reviews
PHI052 reviews
Show 17 more courses
PHIL0052 reviews
PHIL012 reviews
PHIL0122 reviews
PHIL0202 reviews
141531 review
24838PHIL201 review
ETHC51 review
ETHICPHIL1 review
PHIL020PHIL0011 review
PHIL0251 review
PHIL1201 review
PHIL1PHIL121 review
PHIL251 review
PHILO0011 review
PHILOSOPHY1 review
PHILOSOPHY0011 review
PHILPHIL1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 2 · A 1 · A- 1

B range

5

B+ 2 · B 3

C range

2

C+ 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1