AI Rate Professor

Economics

Don Carlisle

ECON40 · ECON25 · ECON040 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Take him online if and writing, but avoid him if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardSolid Online TeacherReading RequiredWriting AssignmentsMixed Essay Feedback
  • All evidence comes from online reviews, with two positive experiences and one strongly negative one.
  • Students can earn A grades, but , and writing create real effort.
  • The main risk is vague essay expectations and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

All reported grades are A, but students , and writing.

All Easy A evidence comes from online reviews, with no in-person evidence.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Students describe the course as not too hard, but reading and .

, so course easiness cannot be compared by format.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Online reviews do , though participation is mentioned.

, and there is no in-person evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

63/100

Two students recommend the course, but and grading.

Recommendation evidence is online only, with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

A grades are common, but one review says essays can be graded harshly when students challenge the material.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

The , and writing without being described as overwhelming by most students.

Format shift

Only online workload evidence is available.

Teaching experience

Average

66/100

Students call him solid and worthwhile online, but the .

Format shift

Only online teaching evidence is available.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

, and writing rather than major exams.

Format shift

Only online assessment evidence is available.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mixed but lean positive, with students calling the class worthwhile while and writing.

Main concern

Essay prompts and .

What students said

“The ”
ECON040
“Weekly chapters to read with quizzes.”
ECON25
“ .”
ECON40

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes but do not clearly prove the exam format, proctoring, .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes but do not clearly prove webcam use, proctoring, .

Weekly QuizzesExam Policy Not Clearly Proven
“Weekly chapters to read with quizzes.”
ECON25

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

Teaching Quality

66/100

“Don is a solid online teacher.”

Recommendation Rate

63/100

“ .”

Workload Reality

52/100

“Weekly chapters to read with quizzes.”

Theme 1

Teaching Style

  • Don is a solid online teacher.
  • All in all, good class. .

Theme 2

Workload And Grades

  • Weekly chapters to read with quizzes.
  • Not too hard, but be ready to write a little.
  • The

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

45/100

Evidence confidence

Only , and opinions are mixed despite consistent A grades.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ECON0401 review
ECON251 review
ECON401 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values