AI Rate Professor

English

Jeffrey Maryanow

ESLESL · ENG360 · ENG001 · ESL352 · ENG251 · ESL150 · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
57/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
62.5%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Take him if and can handle picky grading, but if you mainly want an easy A.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderStrong FeedbackReading HeavyCaring but Picky
  • and commitment to learning.
  • Getting a high grade usually requires careful writing, participation, and revision.
  • Reviews are split because some students value the rigor while others feel judged or discouraged.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

36/100

An A is possible, but students repeatedly say it takes real effort, careful writing, office hours, and tolerance for .

Both formats describe tough grading, with require sustained revision and participation.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

38/100

The course content is not conceptually extreme, but , and high writing standards make it challenging.

Online evidence emphasizes hard work, while , and detail-focused writing expectations.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

24/100

Participation is repeatedly emphasized, and one online tag states that skipping class can make passing unlikely.

Online reviews give the clearest strict-attendance signal, while in-person reviews mostly stress .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

and learning, but several strongly warn against his strict and sometimes discouraging style.

Online reviews lean positive but limited, while praise and strong warnings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Students repeatedly call him a and .

Format shift

providing the most detailed examples.

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Reviews mention lots of , and writing-heavy expectations.

Format shift

Online reviews mention hard work, while and paper workload.

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

, and clarity are often praised, but some students describe him as harsh, picky, or discouraging.

Format shift

Both formats include positive teaching evidence, while and harsh experiences.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Comments mostly discuss papers, writing, homework, reading, participation, and .

Format shift

and assignments as the main assessment evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly positive about feedback and care, but , and heavy writing expectations.

Main concern

and demanding writing standards frustrate some students.

What students said

“This was not an easy A class; he made sure that you were prepared before passing you.”
ENG001
“ if you want to be judge all the time and he is very picky about all the little details.”
ENG001

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews show a demanding but potentially valuable writing class with .

Main concern

Students must work hard and .

What students said

“If you .”
ENG001
“ .”
ENG001

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the structure.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, quiz format, midterm format, final format, or proctoring rules.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam use, proctoring, .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you care about learning, this is the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation patterns. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

70/100

“ and was always there to help if you had a question.”

⚖️

25/100

“He is very picky about all the little details and will knock your grade down a lot for it.”

📚 Workload Reality

34/100

“He is a little tough, he does make you read a lot.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He genuinely cares about his students, grades fairly, and expects that and participate during in-class discussions.
  • He was passionate about what he was doing.
  • He like to yell at the class a lot.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • This was not an easy A class; he made sure that you were prepared before passing you.
  • .
  • It took me a while to get used to him, but after a bit of trial and error I got the hang of it.

Theme 3

✍️

  • , and is always willing to answer a question or state something more clearly to help students understand.
  • Mr. Maryanow helped me prep for UC Davis.
  • Visit his office hours whenever a .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

The 17 reviews span many years and , and writing-heavy expectations despite mixed opinions.

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENG00110 reviews
ENG2512 reviews
ENG3602 reviews
ESL1501 review
ESL3521 review
Show 1 more courses
ESLESL1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 1 · A- 1

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

2

D+ 1 · D- 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1