AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

John Davis

SOC001 · PHIL025 · PHIL25 · 14191POLS · POS1 · PHILO25 · PHYLISOPHY1 · POLS005 · PHILOSOPHY · 26 lifetime ratings

AI rating
88/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
85.71%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if and are willing to attend class consistently.

Best fit · Effort For RewardLecture HeavyEngaging ThinkerAttendance MattersClear Test HintsMixed Organization
  • Most students praise his humor, intelligence, and lecture-driven teaching.
  • Grades are very reachable if , and .
  • A minority describe him as .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

An A is very attainable, but students repeatedly say it depends on attending class, taking notes, and .

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The material can require real thinking, but tests and .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they mix easy testing with intellectually demanding discussion.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

because and participation matters.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

Most students recommend him for engaging lectures, humor, support, and fair paths to success.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

Grades are generally , and follow test guidance.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Workload is usually manageable, with , and participation .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

80/100

Most students find him engaging, funny, helpful, and intellectually strong, though .

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Grades , and occasional group work.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

26 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews describe a lecture-heavy professor who rewards attendance, notes, participation, and .

Main concern

.

What students said

“Skipping class isn't ideal because he basically gives you exactly what is on the test while he lectures.”
POLS005
“If you are a lazy student then look elsewhere.”
PHILOSOPHY
“ if you go to class and .”
PHIL25

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are usually lecture-driven and manageable, but reviews .

Lecture-Based TestsEasy Tests With NotesFew Things Graded

Assessment risk

Standard

68/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

attend and take notes, but the exact book or proctoring rules are not clearly proven.

Lecture-Based TestsEasy Tests With Notes
“ what he says and you should be just fine.”
PHIL025
“ if you go to class and .”
PHIL25

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Go to class every day and as expected and you will be fine.”

Voice snapshots generated from 26 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

80/100

“His lectures are engaging and relevant.”

📈 Grade Path

78/100

“You basically just have to write a , and do well in the quizzes and you'll get an A.”

⚠️

20/100

“Skipping class isn't ideal because he basically gives you exactly what is on the test while he lectures.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Great lecturer with a good sense of humor.
  • His lectures are engaging and relevant.
  • He is a genius so he is difficult to follow at times, but he welcomes questions with open arms.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • what he says and you should be just fine.
  • If you are a lazy student then look elsewhere.
  • Anyone .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Structure

  • but in result he makes the .
  • Very disappointing. Unclear and unorganized.
  • He grades based on how he THINKS you're doing.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

26

Recent reviews read by the AI

26

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 26 reviews span many years and show consistent themes despite some mixed opinions.

Inside 26 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 56
3 out of 54
2 out of 53
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PHIL255 reviews
PHIL0254 reviews
PHILOSOPHY4 reviews
POLS0054 reviews
247282 reviews
Show 5 more courses
PHILO252 reviews
POS12 reviews
14191POLS1 review
PHYLISOPHY11 review
SOC0011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

15 reported outcomes

A range

12

A 9 · A- 3

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1