AI Rate Professor

English

Monica Maudet

LOGICENG2 · ENG2 · ENG02 · ENG001 · ENGL251 · ENGLISH251 · ENGLISH2 · ENGL002 · ENG002 · ENG1AND2 · ENGLISH002 · EENGL · ENGLISH · ENGL2 · ENGLISH1 · ENG251 · ENGL001 · 41 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if you want a supportive English professor who pushes revision and .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyExcellent writing feedbackRevision-friendly gradingCaring and accessibleInspiring discussionsSome organization issues
  • Students repeatedly say she improves and revisions.
  • Grades are forgiving if , and ask for help.
  • A minority found her judgmental, opinionated, or confusing, but the dominant tone is highly positive.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

An A , and steady essay work, but it is not always effortless.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The because , though critical thinking and frequent writing add challenge.

All course-easiness evidence comes from in-person English reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

58/100

because students say class meetings matter, but strict attendance penalties are not clearly proven.

, and no online attendance evidence exists.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

91/100

Students overwhelmingly recommend her because , and helps weak writers improve.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

84/100

Revision opportunities, late acceptance, and keep working.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

60/100

Students mention many essays and some challenging work, but most say it is manageable and worthwhile.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Excellent

94/100

Most students praise her as , and highly helpful outside class.

Format shift

Teaching evidence is entirely in person.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

15/100

Reviews focus on essays, revisions, projects, and .

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

41 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students describe a caring, feedback-heavy English class where essays can often be revised and effort is rewarded.

Main concern

Some students .

What students said

“She also allows .”
ENG251
“The course work is challenging and stimulating but .”
ENGL2
“She is very judgmental.”
ENG251

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly describe exams, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy or .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She gives you all the ideas and templates you need in order to have a successful essay.”

Voice snapshots generated from 41 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

94/100

“ .”

⚖️

84/100

“Even if its past due, she will still accept it with .”

📚 Workload Reality

60/100

“Lots of work but you learn a lot!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • and .
  • She gives you all the ideas and templates you need in order to have a successful essay.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades & Work

  • You have to do the work and show up, but you really learn.
  • The course work is challenging and stimulating but .
  • No easy way out in this class so I actually learned.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • She opens her doors to help anyone with .
  • She really cares about our writing.
  • She is always open to help out.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

41

Recent reviews read by the AI

41

Lifetime ratings

89/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 41 in-person reviews span many years and , and personality.

Inside 41 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 527
4 out of 59
3 out of 50
2 out of 54
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG25115 reviews
ENG0024 reviews
ENG24 reviews
ENGL2512 reviews
ENGLISH0022 reviews
Show 13 more courses
ENGLISH12 reviews
2511 review
EENGL1 review
ENG0011 review
ENG021 review
ENG1AND21 review
ENGL0011 review
ENGL0021 review
ENGL21 review
ENGLISH1 review
ENGLISH21 review
ENGLISH2511 review
LOGICENG21 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 4 · A 3 · A- 1

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values