AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Isaac Vannasone

MATH360 · MATH230 · MATH200 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
35/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

unless you can learn independently and handle heavy math practice with limited support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHard To UnderstandLots Of HomeworkTest HeavyNot Very HelpfulNo Extra Credit
  • .
  • The course can be survivable with notes and attention, but it takes steady effort.
  • Tests, quizzes, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

An A is possible, but students describe lots of , and a need to pay close attention.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

The math content feels challenging because several students found lectures hard to understand and support limited.

, and they consistently point to difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

as mandatory, but students say taking notes and paying attention is important.

, while online evidence does not exist.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Most students do not recommend him because , and help is limited.

All and is mostly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Students mention tough grading, no , and a demanding test-heavy structure.

Format shift

The .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

The workload is heavy because students mention lots of and tests.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Teaching quality is weak overall because multiple students found him hard to understand or .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and they are mixed but mostly critical.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

and quizzes online but tests and the .

Format shift

The , and an in-class final.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

but lean negative, with repeated concerns about hard-to-understand lectures and limited help.

Main concern

Students may struggle if .

What students said

“His lectures were hard to understand.”
MATH360
“ .”
MATH200
“if and pay attention; you will do fine.”
MATH230

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The but demanding, with in-class tests and and quizzes.

In-Class TestsIn-Class FinalOnline HomeworkOnline Quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and the final are in class, while homework and .

In-Class TestsIn-Class FinalOnline HomeworkOnline Quizzes
“ and quizzes online and the tests are in class and so is the final.”
MATH230
“Lots of .”
MATH360

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . Lots of homework plus quizzes. Does not give . . His lectures were hard to understand.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“His lectures were hard to understand.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

30/100

“ .”

⚖️

25/100

“Does not give .”

📚 Workload

25/100

“Lots of .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures were hard to understand.
  • .
  • and understandable.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Lots of .
  • Does not give .
  • if and pay attention; you will do fine.

Theme 3

📝 About Tests And Assignments

  • and quizzes online and the tests are in class and so is the final.
  • there are .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because and years, but the sample is still small.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH2302 reviews
MATH2001 review
MATH3601 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values