AI Rate Professor

Social Work

Jill Maze

HDEV121 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
86/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if you want a supportive teacher and are willing to participate, work in groups, and meet firm deadlines.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful TeacherParticipation MattersGroup WorkStrict Late PolicyExtra Credit
  • Students describe Maze as very helpful and .
  • Getting a high grade is possible, but strong work habits and participation matter.
  • The course uses groups, binder checks, and rather than a .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

An A range grade is realistic with participation, binder checks, and , but one student says she is a .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The course sounds structured and and available.

Only in-person reviews describe the course, so no format comparison is possible.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Participation is emphasized, but the reviews do not clearly prove a .

In-person reviews mention participation, while there is no online evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Both reviews are strongly positive overall, .

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

helps, but and no late work acceptance.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

60/100

Work includes binder checks, participation, and group activity, but no overwhelming workload is reported.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention workload.

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

Students call her awesome, great, thorough, and helpful in the long run.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Reviews mention binder checks, participation, groups, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and organization but warn that she makes students work for strong grades.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“She's so awesome!!”
HDEV121
“ .”
HDEV121

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The reviews do not clearly prove the .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format or .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She's a great teacher, but makes you work for a great grade.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting teaching support and ; credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

92/100

“Overall one of .”

⚖️

58/100

“ .”

📈 Effort For Grade

68/100

“can easily get 15 xtra credit points”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She's so awesome!!
  • She's a great teacher, but makes you work for a great grade.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades And Effort

  • .
  • Late work is not accept it, but .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

45/100

Evidence confidence

Only , but they are consistent about support and effort expectations.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

HDEV1212 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A- 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values