AI Rate Professor

English

Kim Lorraine

ENGL30035 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
75/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Consider Lorraine if you want a but can handle firm rules and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaringStrict expectationsLots of homeworkExtra creditParticipation matters
  • The only review describes Lorraine as caring but firm about excuses.
  • The course includes lots of , and .
  • Evidence is thin because there is only one in-person review.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

The reported A and help, but lots of homework and no-excuses expectations mean the grade is not effortless.

All evidence comes from one in-person review, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

56/100

The course does not sound conceptually extreme, but lots of .

, so format comparison is not possible.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

Participation matters and the no-excuses comment suggests limited flexibility.

The .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

The review is positive overall because the professor is caring, but it flags strict expectations.

Recommendation evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

68/100

and an A , but the no-excuses tone prevents calling it lenient.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

The LOTS OF the positive grade outcome.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

The professor is described as caring, but also strict about excuses.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

The review points to homework, participation, and .

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists, and it emphasizes assignments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The but no-excuses class with homework and participation expectations.

Main concern

The evidence is limited to one review, so confidence is low.

What students said

“very caring but there would be no excuses in her class”
ENGL30035

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

No Clear Exam Evidence

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The policy.

No Clear Exam Evidence

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“very caring but there would be no excuses in her class”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting limited evidence about teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“very caring but there would be no excuses in her class”

📚 Workload

32/100

“very caring but there would be no excuses in her class”

⚖️

68/100

“very caring but there would be no excuses in her class”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • very caring but there would be no excuses in her class

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • very caring but there would be no excuses in her class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

30/100

Evidence confidence

, so the analysis is directionally useful but not well supported.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGL300351 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values