AI Rate Professor

Communication

Jill Alcorn

COMM07 · SPEECH1 · SPEECH8 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
93/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.4

The decision

She looks like a strong choice for students who want a .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyClear and organizedEasy classApproachableGreat teacher
  • The and predictable expectations.
  • In-person comments are mostly positive but sparse, with two reviews containing no details.
  • The class appears easy, but the evidence base is old and limited.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

Very low difficulty ratings and an easy-class comment suggest an A is likely with modest effort.

, while in-person evidence directly calls the class easy.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

88/100

Comments and difficulty scores point to accessible, beginner-level course demands.

Both formats support low difficulty, though online evidence is clearer about structure.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

Neither online nor in-person reviews clearly prove an .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Students describe her as , and great, with little substantive criticism.

Online evidence praises organization, while and ease.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

Low difficulty and reported strong grades suggest lenient outcomes, though .

Format shift

Both formats suggest low difficulty, but .

Workload

Light

84/100

The course is repeatedly framed as easy, with .

Format shift

In-person evidence directly says easy class, while online evidence .

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

The , and overall teaching quality.

Format shift

Online evidence is specific about clarity, while but less detailed.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly identify whether .

Format shift

Neither format gives enough detail to distinguish assessment balance.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

and describe an approachable teacher and easy class, but two give no details.

Main concern

The and partly vague.

What students said

“approachable, easy class”
SPEECH1
“Jill is a great teacher!”
SPEECH1
“No Comments”
SPEECH8

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The single online review says the , and predictable.

Main concern

Only one online review supports this format, so confidence is limited.

What students said

“ and organized.”
COMM07
“You know what is expected no surprises”
COMM07

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The or exam requirements.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

The online review does not .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and organized. You know what is expected no surprises”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching clarity, class ease, and evidence limits. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“ and organized.”

📈 Ease and Workload

86/100

“approachable, easy class”

👍 Recommendation Level

90/100

“Jill is a great teacher!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and organized.
  • Jill is a great teacher!
  • approachable, easy class

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty

  • approachable, easy class
  • You know what is expected no surprises

Theme 3

⚠️ About Evidence Quality

  • No Comments
  • No Comments

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Five reviews show mostly positive ratings, but several are old and two contain no usable detail.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

SPEECH13 reviews
COMM071 review
SPEECH81 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values