AI Rate Professor

English

Anna Boyle

ENG215 · ENG001 · ENGL251 · ENGLI251 · ENGL1 · ENGLENGL · ENG251 · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.2

The decision

Avoid this professor unless you , and limited support.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerStrict essay gradingUnprofessional toneLow pass rateHeavy writing workloadNot helpful
  • , and repeated warnings not to take the class.
  • Students report very low pass rates and strict essay standards, especially in ENG251.
  • A few students learned useful writing habits, but the dominant experience is stressful and unrewarding.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

8/100

Getting an A appears extremely unlikely because , and final grades capped near C levels.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

The course content itself is writing-heavy and not impossible, but her pace, standards, and limited guidance make it feel much harder.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

Attendance and punctuality appear strict because students warn against skipping and say .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Most students directly because they found her rude, harsh, and unhelpful.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

5/100

Students repeatedly report extremely strict essay grading, late-work refusal, low pass rates, and few high grades.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

18/100

The class , and high-stakes writing assignments.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Most comments describe her as boring, unclear, unhelpful, rude, or unprofessional despite a few positive outliers.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

15/100

Assessment appears , and vocabulary quizzes rather than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are overwhelmingly negative, citing strict grading, low pass rates, rude interactions, and little useful help.

Main concern

and support is weak.

What students said

“ .”
ENG251
“She is a if only 5 minutes late).”
ENG251
“Strictest person I've ever met in my entire life; too too tough on students.”
ENG251

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention vocabulary quizzes but do not clearly prove the .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam policyVocabulary quizzes mentioned

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly prove the .

Vocabulary quizzes mentionedReviews do not clearly prove exam policy
“loads of .”
ENG251

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . She was the most unprofessional and rude instructor I have ever had the displeasure of meeting.”

Voice snapshots generated from 20 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“She knows her stuff, but she's not a very good teacher.”

⚖️

5/100

“She doesn't grade you on a standard level. She grades you on her level.”

🚫 Recommendation Risk

12/100

“ . . Very unprofessional.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and really mean and rude to students
  • She didn't help when we asked questions unless it was a workshop day.
  • Not helpful! Boring!

Theme 2

📉 About Grades And Passing

  • out of 30 students only 2 or 3 passed.
  • only like 5 or 6 passed with C's and highest was a B.
  • At the of the day she will give you not higher than 70% on final grades.

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • we were expected to arrive with rough drafts and .
  • .
  • Makes you read a lot for nothing.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

20

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty reviews across several years are detailed and strongly consistent, though most are older.

Inside 20 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 56
1 out of 510

Course coverage

ENG25112 reviews
ENG2152 reviews
ENGLI2512 reviews
ENG0011 review
ENGL11 review
Show 2 more courses
ENGL2511 review
ENGLENGL1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Fail 1 · Not_Sure_Yet 1 · Rather_Not_Say 1