AI Rate Professor

Education

Janet Hale

CHLD39 · COS126 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
60/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

, but do not expect organized or technically strong teaching.

Best fit · Easy A HunterExtremely EasyUnorganizedSlow PaceWeak Tech SkillsMixed Teaching Quality
  • Students agree the class is very easy, especially one review calling it the easiest class taken.
  • Teaching quality is a major concern because comments describe her as , and weak with computers.
  • The course may suit students who prioritize ease over strong instruction.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

90/100

The course appears to be an easy A because one student calls it the easiest class they have ever taken.

Only in-person evidence exists; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

92/100

The content and expectations appear extremely easy, even though the teaching quality is criticized.

Only in-person evidence exists; there are no online course-difficulty comments.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The reviews .

Only in-person evidence exists; there are no online attendance comments.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

, but the teaching experience is too disorganized for a strong recommendation.

Only in-person evidence exists; there are no online recommendation comments.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

85/100

The class is described as extremely .

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists; there are no online grading comments.

Workload

Featherlight

90/100

One student says it is by far the easiest class they have ever taken, and no workload complaints appear.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists; there are no online workload comments.

Teaching experience

Poor

45/100

Students criticize slow pacing, disorganization, weak computer skills, and not understanding some chapters.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists; there are no online teaching comments.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

The reviews do not clearly identify whether .

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists; there are no online assessment comments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person reviews describe the class as extremely easy but criticize organization, pacing, and computer use.

Main concern

The main concern is weak organization and poor command of some course tools or chapters.

What students said

“by far the easiest class I have ever taken.”
COS126
“ teaches, doesn't understand how to use a computer”
CHLD39

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The format or requirements.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“by far the easiest class I have ever taken.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

📈 Easy Grade Potential

90/100

“by far the easiest class I have ever taken.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“ teaches, doesn't understand how to use a computer”

🧭 Course Ease

92/100

“but like I said EXTREAMLY easy!!”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • by far the easiest class I have ever taken.
  • but like I said EXTREAMLY easy!!

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • yes she is slow and she does not know how to use a computer.
  • teaches, doesn't understand how to use a computer

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there are only two older reviews, though both clearly support the easy-course and weak-organization themes.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CHLD391 review
COS1261 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values