AI Rate Professor

Not Specified

Drew Stutsman

ENG001 · ENGLISH1 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
94/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

if you want an engaging English class with and a realistic path to an A.

Best fit · Easy A HunterEasy graderFun discussionsClear expectationsHelpful with essaysOccasionally off topic
  • Most students describe him as , and engaging.
  • Grades appear very attainable if , and .
  • and picking on people, but the overall tone is strongly positive.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

An A appears very reachable because students , and feedback before submission.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

82/100

Students call it an easy, low-stress class with and manageable papers.

Only in-person reviews exist, so course easiness is based on that format.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

65/100

Showing up helps because discussions matter, but reviews .

online evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Students strongly recommend him because , and .

Only in-person reviews exist, and most are strongly positive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

88/100

Students directly call him an easy grader and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

80/100

The workload is mainly about five papers, and students describe the class as low stress.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload.

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

He is praised as , and engaging, with one concern about drifting off topic.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

15/100

, and class discussions, with .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe assessment.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person reviews describe an engaging, low-stress English course with and strong grade upside.

Main concern

.

What students said

“ . Only about 5 papers the whole semester.”
ENG001
“If you show interest in the class and in then you should get an A”
ENG001

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy.

Exam policy not clearly proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ! and goes out of his way to help you understand the material.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and classroom fit. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“ ! and goes out of his way to help you understand the material.”

📈 Easy A Potential

88/100

“If you show interest in the class and in then you should get an A, he practically grades them then.”

📚 Workload Lightness

80/100

“ . Only about 5 papers the whole semester.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is young and knows how to connect with college aged kids and keeps the class conversations interesting.
  • He is funny and really engages his students in lecture.
  • Class discussions were fun.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • . Only about 5 papers the whole semester.
  • As long as you show up and do the work you can't fail.
  • I never felt stressed about this class and ended up getting an A.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Fit

  • He talked about Honey Boo Boo a lot in class and I would have liked to stay more on topic.
  • He tended to pick on people too.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Five older reviews , and teaching style, though one review is notably negative.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG0014 reviews
ENGLISH11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values