AI Rate Professor

English

Linda Record

ENG2 · ENG1 · ENG3 · ENGLISH1 · ENGL001 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
45/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

if you can tolerate inconsistent communication and manage online coursework independently.

Best fit · Self Taught ProInconsistent online courseHelpful when availableDisorganized deadlinesLate gradingMixed reputation
  • Reviews are sharply split between strong praise and serious complaints about organization and communication.
  • Recent online reviews , and poor course management.
  • Positive , and capable of teaching well.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Some students report getting an A, but , and workload make the effort unpredictable.

Online reviews show higher risk from late grading and unclear deadlines, while and serious organization complaints.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

The English content is not described as conceptually hard, but course management can make the class feel harder than the material itself.

Online reviews make the course feel harder through disorganization, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews , and most concerns focus on online communication and deadlines instead.

Neither online nor in-person reviews clearly prove a .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Recommendation depends heavily on course execution, because students describe both fantastic support and extremely poor organization.

Online evidence is more polarized and recent, while but partly references online courses.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Students complain that promised leniency did not happen and of earning an A.

Format shift

Online reviews contain the , while .

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Online courses are described as a lot of work, with and communication.

Format shift

Workload concerns appear in both format groups, but .

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

She can be helpful and knowledgeable, but repeated organization and communication failures significantly lower the experience.

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is split, while but include a severe online-course complaint.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

, and due dates rather than exams.

Format shift

Both format groups emphasize coursework and assignments more than exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

but include one major complaint that describes an online or distance course experience.

Main concern

Format labeling conflicts with several comments that discuss online courses, so .

What students said

“Amazing teacher.”
ENG2
“She is an awesome teacher, I encourage .”
ENG1
“ and and late, communication tardy and unprofessional.”
ENG2

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed, with two recent reviews reporting severe disorganization and two praising her helpfulness and teaching.

Main concern

The biggest risk is inconsistent communication, late grading, and .

What students said

“Didn't hear back from her for almost a month.”
ENGLISH1
“Everyone didn't know when things were supposed to be turned in because there would be two different dates.”
ENG1
“Very helpful and understanding to her students.”
ENGL001

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove webcam use, proctoring, open-book exams, midterms, finals, or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring policy, or whether exams were open-book or closed-book.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

, and communication but do not clearly prove exam format or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She was good the first few weeks and posting assignments.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“She knows her stuff; .”

⚠️ Organization Risk

35/100

“Everyone didn't know when things were supposed to be turned in because there would be two different dates.”

👍 Recommendation Level

50/100

“FANTASTIC PROFESSOR! Very helpful and understanding to her students.”

Theme 1

💻 About Online Course Management

  • Didn't hear back from her for almost a month.
  • Everything started .
  • English Department had to be contacted a few times.

Theme 2

👩‍🏫 About Helpfulness

  • Very helpful and understanding to her students.
  • and I learned so much from her!
  • She was always on AIM or in her office to help.

Theme 3

📄 and Work

  • She said she but she wasn't!!
  • and and late.
  • Both online courses, so they were a lot of work.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Eight reviews give meaningful pattern evidence, but they are old, polarized, and some format labels conflict with the comments.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ENG12 reviews
ENG22 reviews
ENGLISH12 reviews
ENG31 review
ENGL0011 review

Reported outcomes

F results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1