AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Liana Hoskinson

MATHLAB · MATH200 · MATH230 · MATH70 · MTH360 · MATH070 · MATH360 · MATH154 · MATHSECT · 23 lifetime ratings

AI rating
84/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you want a strong math teacher and are willing to stay engaged, but if you need a very gentle teaching style.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear math explanationsHelpful when engagedStrict classroom toneFair effort requiredMixed personality feedback
  • Most students praise her for and explanations.
  • Students who attend, pay attention, and ask questions tend to report strong outcomes.
  • A minority describe her as rude, abrasive, or unhelpful, especially when they struggle or ask for help.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

Students can do well and even earn A-level results, but comments repeatedly , and real effort.

All grade-effort evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online evidence.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Math content and , though tests and some courses can still feel challenging.

All course-difficulty evidence comes from in-person math reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

as formally mandatory, but multiple comments say daily presence and attention matter for success.

, and no online attendance policy exists.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

Most students recommend her because and helps engaged students succeed, despite some strong complaints about tone.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Tests are usually fair if students study, but some students say and not always well matched.

Format shift

online grading evidence.

Workload

Moderate

63/100

Workload is not often described as heavy, but students must keep up with , and studying.

Format shift

Workload evidence is in-person only and mostly indirect.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Most reviews praise her clarity, notes, and willingness to help, while a smaller group reports harshness or poor support.

Format shift

Teaching-quality .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

, and reviews, suggesting a mix with meaningful exam weight.

Format shift

Assessment evidence is in-person only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

23 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are , and help for students who make an effort.

Main concern

Some students find her tone harsh or .

What students said

“I never understood math until I took her class.”
MATH200
“ and her notes make learning math easy.”
MATH230
“The most abrasive and hateful math teacher i have encountered in the math lab”
MATHLAB

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams appear standard and study-dependent, with some complaints that and reviews are broad.

Tests Based on StudyingHomework and Tests May DifferNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book, or closed-book policy.

Tests Based on StudyingHomework and Tests May DifferNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“Her test's and hw do not match up at all!”
MATH70
“ if you pay attention and ask questions.”
MATH154
“ if you study”
MATH200

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I never understood math until I took her class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 23 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and personality; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“She does a great job of breaking down and explaining mathematical concepts.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

82/100

“ ”

⚖️

62/100

“ if you pay attention and ask questions.”

📈 Effort Required

70/100

“if you're there daily and truly apply yourself you will do well.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is very easy to understand, and .
  • She gives really good notes and .
  • Great teacher. and focused.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • if you study
  • if you're there daily and truly apply yourself you will do well.
  • Her test's and hw do not match up at all!

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She really cares about her students and teaches so clearly.
  • Seems annoyed when you ask for help.
  • The most abrasive and hateful math teacher i have encountered in the math lab

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

23

Recent reviews read by the AI

23

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 23 reviews span several years and show a consistent pattern of strong teaching with some tone concerns.

Inside 23 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 514
4 out of 54
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH2307 reviews
MATH2006 reviews
MATH1544 reviews
MATH0701 review
MATH3601 review
Show 4 more courses
MATH701 review
MATHLAB1 review
MATHSECT1 review
MTH3601 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values