AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Susan Brunkhorst

PSY39 · CD138 · CFS80 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
41/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.3

The decision

if you mainly want a very easy grade and can tolerate weak lectures.

Best fit · Easy A HunterVery EasyPoor LecturerSweet But IneffectiveBook-Based Quizzes
  • Students describe the class as extremely easy to pass with little challenge.
  • Teaching quality is weak, with comments saying she reads instead of teaches.
  • Her personality is seen as sweet and understanding, but that does not offset the poor instruction.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

95/100

Students describe the class as an almost guaranteed A with .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

90/100

The course content sounds very basic and low challenge, especially where quizzes come directly from the book.

Only in-person reviews discuss course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The reviews do .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they do not give a .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Despite the easy grade, students repeatedly criticize the teaching as boring, unprepared, and ineffective.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

95/100

because one student says there is no way not to get an A+.

Format shift

.

Workload

Featherlight

90/100

Workload sounds very light because the main described assessments are book-based quizzes.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Students say she is sweet but boring, unprepared, and ineffective at teaching.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Assessment evidence mainly mentions quizzes from the book, with .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

but poor lecture quality and preparation.

Main concern

Students say she reads to the class and does not teach effectively.

What students said

“all she does is READ to the class like we are in her kinder-garden clsss”
CD138
“There is no way you cant get an A+ in this class.”
CFS80

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes straight from the book but do not clearly prove the .

Book-Based QuizzesExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly prove midterm, final, open-book, or proctoring rules.

Book-Based QuizzesExam Policy Not Clearly Proven
“the quizes that she gives are straight out of the book”
CFS80

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is very sweet and understanding, but she is not a teacher.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading; credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“she doesnt teach anything, all she does is READ to the class”

📈 Easy Grade

95/100

“There is no way you cant get an A+ in this class.”

⚠️ Preparation Issues

35/100

“This adjunct instructor comes to class unprepared 25% of the time”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • This teacher is so boring.
  • she doesnt teach anything, all she does is READ to the class
  • This adjunct instructor comes to class unprepared 25% of the time

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • There is no way you cant get an A+ in this class.
  • Easiest class ever

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She is very sweet and understanding
  • Judgemental and grandiose from my perspective.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

45/100

Evidence confidence

Only three old reviews are available, but they are and weak teaching.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CD1381 review
CFS801 review
PSY391 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values