AI Rate Professor

English

Rick Garza

ENG1A · ENG251 · ENG360 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Avoid him if and , but he may fit students who can ask questions and tolerate subjective writing standards.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPicky GraderUnclear GradesApproachableDeep InterpretationMixed Recommendation
  • and clarity.
  • One and useful for deeper literary interpretation.
  • The small review set is mixed but leans negative because .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Getting an A likely requires strong writing and tolerance for .

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The course content itself seems manageable, but deep interpretation and .

Only in-person reviews describe course challenge.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews do .

No online or .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Students hesitate or warn against taking him mainly because of bad, picky, or .

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

Two of three as bad, picky, careless, or unfair.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Reviews mention interpreting stories and writing reaction essays but do not describe an overwhelming workload.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

45/100

He is approachable and can teach deeper interpretation, but and negative ratings weaken the experience.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Reviews focus on essays, interpretation, and .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

concerns about picky or unfair grading and one note that he is approachable.

Main concern

students.

What students said

“He grades bad.”
ENG1A
“Hard to know what he is thinking or where you stand grade wise”
ENG360
“Not a .”
ENG251

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove an final format.

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and grading but do not clearly prove any exam policy.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Not a . Carlessness shows in .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation tone. Credibility rating: Low.

⚖️

20/100

“Not a . Carlessness shows in .”

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“Really gets you to understand how to dig deep in interpreting stories and .”

👍 Recommendation Level

35/100

“ .”

Theme 1

⚖️

  • Hes an author and is really really picky.
  • He grades bad.
  • Not a .

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very laid back.
  • Really gets you to understand how to dig deep in interpreting stories and .
  • if you ask!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

Only three old reviews are available, with limited detail and no grade data, though .

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG1A1 review
ENG2511 review
ENG3601 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values