AI Rate Professor

English As A Second Language

Susan Franciskovic

ESL340 · ESLESL · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
39/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if you mainly want an easy course and are not relying on strong ESL skill development.

Best fit · Easy A HunterEasy ClassWeak Skill BuildingLimited HelpLow Teaching Quality
  • Students describe the class as easy, but the comments question whether students gain useful English skills.
  • Two detailed reviews say she does not help students enough for jobs or the next English level.
  • The evidence base is small, and one review has no comment, so confidence is limited.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

The class appears easy because students explicitly call it easy and report very low difficulty, but there is little grade evidence.

; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The course content appears low in difficulty, but that may reflect weak standards rather than strong beginner support.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

The detailed comments are negative because students say she does not teach well or help them build needed skills.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

Low difficulty and the word easy suggest lenient expectations, but .

Format shift

, and .

Workload

Light

75/100

The class is described as easy with low reported difficulty, and no review mentions heavy work.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

The detailed reviews criticize her teaching quality and say she does not help students progress.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly describe whether .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person reviews suggest the course is easy but may provide weak instructional support and skill growth.

Main concern

Students may not get enough help building English skills for the next level.

What students said

“not help me not get job not teach me good”
ESLESL
“Easy and cares not about quality of teaching.”
ESLESL
“Does not help students to get skills for next English level.”
ESLESL

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy or test format.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Does not help students to get skills for next English level.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, difficulty, and skill growth. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“Easy and cares not about quality of teaching.”

👍 Recommendation Level

34/100

“not help me not get job not teach me good”

📈 Course Ease

72/100

“Easy and cares not about quality of teaching.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • not help me not get job not teach me good
  • Easy and cares not about quality of teaching.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy and cares not about quality of teaching.
  • No Comments

Theme 3

⚠️ About Skill Growth

  • Does not help students to get skills for next English level.
  • not help me not get job not teach me good

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only , and one contains no usable comment, so the pattern is weak but mostly negative.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ESLESL2 reviews
ESL3401 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values