AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Kevin Umphfres

PHIL13 · INTROTONT · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
89/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

Take him if you want a pays off.

Best fit · Effort For RewardKnowledgeableThought-ProvokingStudy Guide DrivenRespectfulStudent Focused
  • Students strongly praise his knowledge and professionalism.
  • Study guides appear central and reliable for succeeding in the course.
  • The course is thoughtful rather than overly difficult.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

The class seems grade-friendly if students use the study guides, but comments do not prove a free A.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The course is intellectually thoughtful but not described as punishing or confusing.

Only in-person reviews describe the course experience.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

No online evidence exists, and .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Students recommend him because , and genuinely engaged with the subject.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

75/100

Following the study guides appears to make assessments predictable, but .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

72/100

The workload seems manageable because students emphasize study .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Students describe him as awesome, knowledgeable, thoughtful, and genuinely invested in teaching.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

70/100

Study guides are emphasized, suggesting exam preparation matters more than assignments, though details are limited.

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and describe him as knowledgeable, thoughtful, and organized.

Main concern

The evidence is limited because .

What students said

“AWESOME PROFESSOR”
PHIL13
“He follows his study guides to the letter so use em!”
PHIL13
“he brought more to the table that was thought-provoking rather than preachy.”
INTROTONT

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews suggest predictable exam preparation through study guides, but .

Study Guides Followed CloselyExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly prove exam format, open-book status, or proctoring rules.

Study Guides Followed CloselyExam Policy Not Clearly Proven
“He follows his study guides to the letter so use em!”
PHIL13

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Mr. U is a classy teacher who knows his stuff and genuinely enjoys his students and profession.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, organization, and course value. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“Mr. U is a classy teacher who knows his stuff and genuinely enjoys his students and profession.”

👍 Recommendation Level

90/100

“AWESOME PROFESSOR”

📘 Course Structure

75/100

“He follows his study guides to the letter so use em!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • AWESOME PROFESSOR
  • Mr. U is a classy teacher who knows his stuff and genuinely enjoys his students and profession.
  • he brought more to the table that was thought-provoking rather than preachy.

Theme 2

📈 About Success Strategy

  • He follows his study guides to the letter so use em!
  • I appreciated every Wednesday for two semesters.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Only , so the sentiment is positive but the evidence base is limited.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHIL132 reviews
INTROTONT1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values