AI Rate Professor

Languages

Nicolas Quintana

LING111 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
36/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Take him only if you can manage a and asking questions.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHard chaptersNice but jumbledReading requiredUnclear schedulePassable
  • The only review says the class is hard but contains useful material.
  • Students need to read chapters, ask questions, and attend class to track due dates.
  • The professor is described as nice but disorganized.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

The class is passable, but an A , and managing unclear test and .

All because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Some chapters are described as super hard, so the course content itself is challenging despite useful information.

All because there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

, but students need to go and homework dates.

All because there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

The review is mixed because the class is hard and disorganized, but the professor is nice and the content is useful.

All because there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

There is , but and the unclear schedule raises the effort cost.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Students must read chapters, and tests, and ask questions to stay on pace.

Format shift

All workload .

Teaching experience

Poor

40/100

The professor is described as nice and informative, but jumbled and lacking a .

Format shift

All teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

The , and possible notecards, suggesting a mix of assessments with tests important.

Format shift

All assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The but passable class with useful content and .

Main concern

Missing syllabus dates means students must attend and track due dates themselves.

What students said

“Hard class, I learned some great info though.”
LING111
“He didnt make a syllabus for dates of tests and homework”
LING111

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The review mentions tests and possible notecard use, but does not clearly prove open-book rules, proctoring, or .

TestsPossible Notecard

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The notecard if approved, but does not clearly prove full exam format or proctoring rules.

TestsPossible Notecard
“ if you convince him!”
LING111
“He didnt make a syllabus for dates of tests and homework”
LING111

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Hard class, I learned some great info though.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in difficulty, organization, and assessment. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

40/100

“ .”

📈 Difficulty And Grades

35/100

“Some chapters are super hard.”

📝

55/100

“ if you convince him!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • Ask lots of questions.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • Hard class, I learned some great info though.
  • Some chapters are super hard.

Theme 3

🗓️ About Organization

  • He didnt make a syllabus for dates of tests and homework
  • make sure you go to class to find out when things are due.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

20/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there is and no grade or recommendation data.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

LING1111 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values