AI Rate Professor

Health Science

Mathew Mendoca

Courses not reported · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
33/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
1.0

The decision

if you want real learning, but it may suit students who only want easy material and can tolerate weak instruction.

Best fit · Easy A HunterPoor Content CoverageMisaligned QuizzesEasy MaterialLow Learning Value
  • The student warns against taking the course for serious Social Justice learning.
  • .
  • poor assessment experience.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

The student says it is good for an easy A, but the reported C+ shows outcomes may still .

All Easy A evidence comes from one in-person review, with no online evidence.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

85/100

The material is described as easy and high-school-like, so the intellectual challenge appears low.

All course easiness evidence comes from the in-person review.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review does not clearly .

Only in-person evidence exists, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

The student advises against the course because it teaches little and .

Recommendation evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

The course may be easy, but the C+ grade and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

82/100

The course is described as easy like high school, with no evidence of heavy workload.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

The student says key content was skipped and the course was not useful for retaining information.

Format shift

Teaching evidence .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Quizzes are the only clearly mentioned assessment, but there is not enough detail to classify the as exam-heavy.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists, and it specifically mentions quizzes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

The in-person review says the course is easy but poorly taught and weak for retaining information.

Main concern

The main concern is low teaching quality and .

What students said

“ if you're interested in the Social Justice part.”
11844
“ say about half of the time.”
11844
“Good if you're just trying to get an easy A like high school, but not for actually retaining info.”
11844

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quiz alignment problems but do not clearly prove the .

Quiz Alignment ProblemsExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The , but it does not prove broader exam rules.

Quiz Alignment ProblemsExam Policy Not Clearly Proven
“ say about half of the time.”
11844

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Good if you're just trying to get an easy A like high school, but not for actually retaining info.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“Barely any info was read out of ”

📈 Difficulty And Grades

82/100

“Good if you're just trying to get an easy A like high school, but not for actually retaining info.”

⚖️ Assessment Fit

45/100

“ say about half of the time.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Barely any info was read out of
  • not for actually retaining info.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • Good if you're just trying to get an easy A like high school
  • say about half of the time.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

36/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there is only one review, though it gives concrete criticism about teaching and quizzes.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

118441 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values