AI Rate Professor

History

Erica Jameson

HIST250 · HIST1018 · HST111 · HIST1017 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
31/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

if you like history, write well, and can handle heavy workload with .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy Writing LoadTough GraderVague ExpectationsDiscussion RequiredHelpful When Engaged
  • , and .
  • the assignment directions suggest.
  • Some students value her knowledge and help, but recommendations are sharply mixed.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

A grades are possible, but students describe heavy writing, vague expectations, and needing .

Online evidence shows can help strong writers, while in-person reviews emphasize tough and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The course , and depth rather than simple memorization.

Online reviews explicitly describe analysis-heavy work, while and writing expectations.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Participation and discussion appear important, and one review says she may call on students directly.

The strongest attendance evidence comes from in-person reviews, while online reviews .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Students are split, but the dominant concerns are stress, vague instructions, and excessive workload.

Online reviews are mixed but workload-heavy, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Students repeatedly call the grading tough or .

Format shift

Online reviews mention , while in-person and strictness.

Workload

Overwhelming

10/100

Multiple reviews , and severe stress.

Format shift

Both formats report heavy workload, with online reviews giving the clearest evidence of extreme assignment volume.

Teaching experience

Poor

40/100

Some students praise her intelligence and support, but , and negative classroom tone.

Format shift

Online teaching is seen as helpful but demanding, while and often criticized.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Reviews emphasize homework, reading, papers, paragraphs, participation, and written assignments more than exams.

Format shift

Online reviews are strongly assignment and paper focused, while and some test-heavy tags.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are polarized, with praise for informative lectures but repeated complaints about participation pressure and .

Main concern

Students report and stressful expectations.

What students said

“I've cried because of constant work/stress.”
HIST250
“ .”
HST111

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews describe a writing-heavy history course with , and some learning value.

Main concern

The workload is far heavier than students expected.

What students said

“Insane amount of classes (16,000+ words) and 30+ individual assignments/papers.”
HIST1018
“Generous if you write well.”
HIST1018

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews include some test-heavy tags but do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Exam policy not clearly provenTest-heavy tags appear in some reviews

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly prove closed-book rules, proctoring, midterm, or .

Test-heavy tag presentExam policy not clearly proven

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, midterm, or .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Insane amount of classes (16,000+ words) and 30+ individual assignments/papers.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and teaching consistency. Credibility rating: Medium.

📚 Workload Pressure

10/100

“I've cried because of constant work/stress.”

⚖️

25/100

“ .”

👨‍🏫 Teaching Split

40/100

“Her lectures are informative, and she is more than willing to answer questions that you may have.”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • Insane amount of classes (16,000+ words) and 30+ individual assignments/papers.
  • I've cried because of constant work/stress.

Theme 2

⚖️

  • A "good" paragraph gets you an 8/10.
  • because she didnt make rubrics.

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lectures are informative, and she is more than willing to answer questions that you may have.
  • Forced us to speak but sassed us when she disagreed.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Six reviews across several years give useful but mixed evidence, with detailed workload comments and polarized teaching opinions.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

HIST10182 reviews
HIST2502 reviews
HIST10171 review
HST1111 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

2

B 1 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values