AI Rate Professor

Communication

Michelle Gaddini

COMS1200 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

Take this class only if , and inconsistent teaching quality.

Best fit · Effort For RewardInconsistent experienceGroup projectsAttendance mattersApproachable but toughWeak organization
  • Student experience is sharply split between one very negative recent review and one older positive review.
  • Getting an A seems possible if students attend, follow instructions, and complete the work.
  • The main risk is poor organization and limited teaching value in group-based work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

An A appears realistic with and completed work, but the course is not effortless because participation and group projects matter.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

One student says the class is simple and fun, but and little direct teaching.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

because one review says students must show up consistently and a tag says skipping class means not passing.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Recommendation depends heavily on whether students value her approachable style or are frustrated by disorganization and weak teaching.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Grades seem achievable for students who follow instructions, but there is not enough evidence of .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

The , and group projects, but comments do not prove it is overwhelming.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Teaching quality is inconsistent, with one student praising the class and another saying she does not teach.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

, and group projects rather than exams.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are split, with one student calling the class fun and simple and another saying the professor does not teach.

Main concern

Organization and teaching consistency are the biggest concerns.

What students said

“Does NOT teach.”
COMS1200
“As long as you follow her instructions, show up consistently and on time, and do the work, you'll get an A.”
COMS1200

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format or proctoring policy.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam policy

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“As long as you follow her instructions, show up consistently and on time, and do the work, you'll get an A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and class structure. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“Does NOT teach.”

👍 Recommendation Level

45/100

“ !”

⚖️ Grade Path

68/100

“As long as you follow her instructions, show up consistently and on time, and do the work, you'll get an A.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Does NOT teach.
  • , and understanding.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades & Effort

  • As long as you follow her instructions, show up consistently and on time, and do the work, you'll get an A.
  • She can be tough on people, but she also makes the class really simple and fun.

Theme 3

👥 About Class Structure

  • to write up about each of your classmates faults and share it with them.
  • The class is often hilarious and fun.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

45/100

Evidence confidence

, and they are far apart in time with sharply conflicting opinions.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

COMS12002 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values