AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Daniel Kealey

PHIL1003 · PHIL1001 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
44/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you want a demanding philosophy course and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy ReadingUnclear InstructionsDemanding PhilosophyEngaged DiscussionLong Midterm
  • Online reviews describe intellectually serious philosophy content but frequent confusion around instructions.
  • Students who want deep discussion may value him, but .
  • Assessment complaints focus on a and inconsistent assignment directions.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Getting an A appears difficult because students report , and a long written midterm.

All evidence comes from online reviews; there are no in-person reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The course content is university-level philosophy with and conceptually demanding discussion.

All course difficulty evidence comes from online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Reviews mention participation and discussion, but they do .

Online reviews mention participation matters, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

Recommendation is mixed because one student praises his knowledge while and assessments.

All recommendation evidence is online, with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

because students describe docked points and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

The workload , and a long midterm.

Format shift

Only online reviews mention workload.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

He is knowledgeable and intellectually engaging, but .

Format shift

Online reviews show both strong subject knowledge and repeated clarity issues.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessments appear , and a major midterm.

Format shift

Only online reviews mention assessment types.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

All evidence comes from online courses, where students , and unclear instructions.

Main concern

Unclear directions and .

What students said

“Material challenges you & is interesting, including his outside sources.”
PHIL1001
“His directions are unclear & he goes back on things he's said.”
PHIL1001
“The .”
PHIL1003

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The , while reviews do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, open-book, or closed-book rules.

Long MidtermWritten QuestionsReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online reviews mention a very long midterm with written and fill-in-the-blank questions, but .

Long MidtermWritten QuestionsFill-in-the-Blank Questions
“The .”
PHIL1003
“It was about 40 questions and none of them were multiple choice.”
PHIL1003

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Dr. Kealey is NO JOKE.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, clarity, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“he LOVES to dialogue in the discussion forums and is an incredible wealth of knowledge.”

⚠️ Clarity Issues

30/100

“Very vague on giving out instructions and .”

📚 Course Difficulty

30/100

“If you're not prepared for a real, actual university-level philosophy course you will have difficulty”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he LOVES to dialogue in the discussion forums
  • HE WILL MAKE YOU THINK AND QUESTION
  • His directions are unclear & he goes back on things he's said.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Get ready to read
  • I would have had an A for the class.
  • The .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Four reviews from the same year give consistent evidence about online clarity and difficulty, but the sample is small.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PHIL10012 reviews
PHIL10032 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values