AI Rate Professor

Business

Micheal Graves

CSCI1024 · BA1018 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.5

The decision

if you want a low-effort class, but treat the rating cautiously because there are only two reviews.

Best fit · Easy A HunterVery easy workloadGreat personalityPositive teacherLow difficultyLimited evidence
  • The small review set is positive, with one review praising his teaching and personality.
  • The online review says the class required only 2-3 hours per week and resulted in an A.
  • Evidence is thin, so confidence is limited despite strong ratings.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

The online A with only 2-3 hours per week strongly suggests a low-effort path to a high grade.

Online evidence supports an easy A, while but does not discuss grades.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

84/100

Low difficulty ratings and the light weekly time commitment suggest the course content is easy to handle.

Online evidence directly supports low effort, while comment.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

Neither the .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

Students give positive ratings and praise low workload or personality, but the evidence base is very small.

Online evidence supports low workload, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

One online student earned an A with very little , though evidence is limited.

Format shift

Online evidence supports leniency, while .

Workload

Featherlight

92/100

The online review says the class required only 2-3 hours per week.

Format shift

Online evidence clearly supports a very light workload, while .

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Both reviews are positive, with one directly calling him a great teacher with a great personality.

Format shift

In-person evidence praises his personality, while online evidence focuses on the easy workload rather than teaching detail.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly describe assignments, quizzes, midterms, finals, or .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The but strongly positive about his teaching and personality.

Main concern

The review is too .

What students said

“Great teacher, great personality”
CSCI1024

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

The and an A with only a few hours of weekly effort.

Main concern

There is only one online review and no detail about teaching style or exams.

What students said

“Did not need to spend more than 2-3 hours a week on this class.”
BA1018

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the format.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The , final, open-book, or closed-book policies.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

The online review does not clearly prove .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Did not need to spend more than 2-3 hours a week on this class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in workload, teaching impression, and grade effort. Credibility rating: Low.

📉 Workload

92/100

“Did not need to spend more than 2-3 hours a week on this class.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“Great teacher, great personality”

📈 Grade Effort

88/100

“Did not need to spend more than 2-3 hours a week on this class.”

Theme 1

📉 About Workload

  • Did not need to spend more than 2-3 hours a week on this class.

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Great teacher, great personality

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

, and both are brief, so the main signals are useful but not very robust.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

BA10181 review
CSCI10241 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values