AI Rate Professor

Health Science

Michael Altman

FCS1011 · COSFCS1011 · NUTRI101 · FCSNUT · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
19/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

if , and independent learning.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganizedConfusing StructureHeavy ReadingSlow GradingAlternative Nutrition Focus
  • , and delayed grading.
  • Students can still earn high grades, but the and reading-heavy.
  • One online review strongly praises his knowledge, but the overall tone is negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Grades can be high, but comments , and time-consuming work rather than an easy A.

Online evidence is mixed, while and confusion.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

The content and expectations feel more difficult because students describe the class as , and overly complicated.

Both formats mention structure problems, with and science-based difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

Neither online .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Most students do not recommend the experience because organization, clarity, and .

Online has one strong positive outlier, but .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

High reported grades suggest passing is possible, but as .

Format shift

Online and , but neither format clearly proves lenient grading.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and difficult expectations.

Format shift

, while online reviews focus more on organization.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Most comments describe confusing teaching, poor structure, and knowledge.

Format shift

Online feedback is divided, while and structure.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention reading, homework, tests, and articles, but the .

Format shift

, and tests more clearly than online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, and science-heavy or herb-focused content.

Main concern

Students struggle with and .

What students said

“if you don't read them you will fail and believe me there are a lot!”
COSFCS1011
“The subject is interesting, but he makes it far more complicated than it needs to be.”
FCSNUT

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are sharply split between one very negative review about organization and one very positive review about his knowledge.

Main concern

The and .

What students said

“ and unorganized.”
FCS1011
“This teacher is awesome. He really knows his stuff.”
FCSNUT

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests but do not clearly prove the .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly prove exam format or rules.

Tests MentionedExam Policy Not Clearly Proven
“Homework and look up all the words I've never heard of”
NUTRI101

Online

Online reviews do not clearly .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The subject is interesting, but he makes it far more complicated than it needs to be.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and structure. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“ and unorganized.”

📚 Workload Pressure

25/100

“Lots of .”

👍 Recommendation Level

28/100

“it is impossible to understand what he is wanting.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and unorganized.
  • He is a good teacher who thinks and teaches and thinks out of the box.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload & Structure

  • if you don't read them you will fail and believe me there are a lot!
  • Lots of .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Five reviews across several years give useful patterns, but the sample is small and older.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

FCSNUT2 reviews
COSFCS10111 review
FCS10111 review
NUTRI1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values