AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Ryan Petitfils

MATH1025 · MATH4 · MATHV03 · MATH1500 · ALG2 · MATH2100 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

A good choice if you want a supportive math instructor and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpfulEnthusiasticExtra CreditExtensionsSometimes Rushed
  • Students often describe him as helpful, enthusiastic, and willing to give extensions or .
  • The main drawback is pacing, since he can fall behind and then cram material quickly.
  • Math content is not easy, but effort is often rewarded fairly.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

and , but the math material and reported grades show that an A still requires organization and work.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

46/100

The course material is described as hard at times, and rushed pacing can make it harder to learn.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews mention assignment flexibility and extensions but .

In-person comments show flexible deadlines, but .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

Students generally recommend him because , and gives chances to recover.

The .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

68/100

, extensions, and ample chances to turn in work make grading feel forgiving despite some lower reported grades.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Workload is manageable with support, but students mention overload and cramming when pacing falls behind.

Format shift

and occasional work compression.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Students often call him helpful, caring, and enthusiastic, though some find him hard to engage with or rushed.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

, and work pacing, but do not clearly show an exam-heavy or assignment-only structure.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and enthusiastic teacher with occasional pacing and communication issues.

Main concern

The main concern is rushed coverage when the class falls behind.

What students said

“Gives ample opportunity 2 turn in work and .”
MATHV03
“he'd have 2 cover and cram work into a short time which made hard to learn.”
MATHV03

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book status, or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book status, or final structure.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and extensions.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in support, pacing, and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“Always eager to help his students.”

⚖️

68/100

“Gives ample opportunity 2 turn in work and .”

📈 Difficulty & Pace

46/100

“he'd have 2 cover and cram work into a short time which made hard to learn.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is always super enthusiastic.
  • Always eager to help his students.
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Gives ample opportunity 2 turn in work and .
  • sometimes tries to cram a lot of work in small amount of time makes difficult if
  • the material is hard

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

74/100

Evidence confidence

Nine reviews show consistent themes, but they are older and .

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATHV033 reviews
MATH10252 reviews
ALG21 review
MATH15001 review
MATH21001 review
Show 1 more courses
MATH41 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

2

C- 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1