AI Rate Professor

English

Michael Sifter

ENGLISH3A · ENGLC1000 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Take this professor if , and fair chances to improve through revisions.

Best fit · Effort For RewardDetailed feedbackClear grading criteriaSupportiveRevision-friendlyWriting-heavy
  • and in-person formats.
  • and .
  • The course requires substantial writing, with stricter rules around citations, plagiarism, and AI.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

An A is not effortless because there is a lot of writing and strict citation grading, but revisions and .

Online reviews stress stricter citation rules, while and revision support.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The course is clear and structured, but and research writing keep it from being easy content.

Online students describe a straightforward structure, while in-person students report similar clarity with substantial writing.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

65/100

, and in-person comments describe a hybrid setup meeting once a week.

Online evidence has no attendance issue, while in-person evidence suggests scheduled meetings but .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

Students recommend him because , and .

Both online and in-person reviews are strongly positive, with online comments adding more detail about structure and revisions.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

because revisions are allowed, but citation mistakes and missing works cited can be penalized severely.

Format shift

Online reviews mention the , while and detailed feedback.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

The workload is writing-heavy, with three major papers and a , but it fits the course type.

Format shift

Both formats mention multiple papers, with .

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

Students consistently describe him as , and .

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize structure and feedback, while and supportive atmosphere.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Assessment centers on major writing assignments and revisions rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats describe papers and writing assignments as the main graded work.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews describe a and lots of writing.

Main concern

Students should expect multiple papers and a .

What students said

“This professor created a welcoming atmosphere in his class.”
ENGL-C1000
“Also had 3 papers. The !”
ENGL-C1000
“Alot of writing but and helps you improve.”
English3A

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews praise the , and revision policy while noting strict citation and AI rules.

Main concern

Missing citations or works cited .

What students said

“Fully online course.”
ENGL-C1000
“every one you can revise with ”
ENGL-C1000
“Strict with plagiarism and lack of citations and AI.”
ENGL-C1000

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a , and assessment appears centered on papers instead.

Exam policy not clearly provenMajor papersFinal research paper

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a but do not clearly prove any exam format or proctoring rules.

Three papersLong final paperExam policy not clearly proven
“Also had 3 papers. The !”
ENGL-C1000

Online

Online reviews describe major writing assignments and a final research paper but do .

Major writingsFinal research paperExam policy not clearly proven
“3 major writings with the of our choice.”
ENGL-C1000

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you have the opportunity.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

92/100

“This professor created a welcoming atmosphere in his class.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

96/100

“ if you have the opportunity.”

⚖️

58/100

“he does allow revisions and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • This professor created a welcoming atmosphere in his class.
  • professor Sifter is personable and understands there is life outside of school.
  • Reachable outside of class.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • need 70% on each major assignment but he does allow revisions
  • Strict with plagiarism and lack of citations and AI.
  • Must but allows revisions and .

Theme 3

✍️ About Workload

  • So many papers
  • Also had 3 papers. The !
  • Lots of writing but it is a writing course

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because five recent reviews across online and and strongly consistent.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGL-C10004 reviews
English3A1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1