AI Rate Professor

Communication

Kevin Hendricks

Courses not reported · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Take him if you want a and .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlySupportiveCaringEasy workloadClear gradingHighly recommended
  • Students describe him as enthusiastic, supportive, and caring.
  • Both reviews report A grades with low difficulty.
  • Evidence only comes from online reviews.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

93/100

Both students earned A grades, difficulty was low, and the workload is described as easy to fit into a schedule.

All Easy A evidence comes from online reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

86/100

The course seems approachable because students describe the workload as easy and the professor as supportive.

Only online reviews describe course difficulty, and they consistently frame it as manageable.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

70/100

Reviews do not clearly state an , but participation appears to matter.

Online reviews mention participation indirectly through tags, while there is .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

97/100

because , and makes the class less intimidating.

The recommendation evidence is entirely from online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

88/100

Both reported grades are A and reviews mention .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

88/100

Students describe the workload as easy to fit into most schedules.

Format shift

Only online reviews discuss workload, and they describe it as light.

Teaching experience

Excellent

98/100

Students repeatedly describe him as caring, enthusiastic, supportive, and effective at reducing anxiety.

Format shift

Online reviews are uniformly excellent, with no in-person comparison.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly identify whether .

Format shift

Online .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online students report a very supportive professor, easy workload, and strong recommendation.

Main concern

Participation may matter, but students do not describe it as stressful.

What students said

“The workload as a whole is very easy to fit into most schedules.”
19611
“ !”
19611

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Honestly, one of the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

98/100

“Professor Hendricks is very enthusiastic and supportive, and .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

97/100

“ !”

📚 Workload

88/100

“The workload as a whole is very easy to fit into most schedules.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Hendricks is very enthusiastic and supportive, and .
  • He is such a nice professor.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The workload as a whole is very easy to fit into most schedules.
  • I had a bit of anxiety about taking a public speaking class, but he made it a lot less scary.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because the reviews are recent and consistent but only .

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

196112 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values