AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Donald Pierce

CISP300 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
0/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

unless you can teach yourself and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProLittle HelpTough GraderTest HeavyConfusing QuizzesAvoid If Possible
  • The only review describes extremely poor support and .
  • because required pseudocode and flowcharts can determine full credit.
  • The student strongly recommends choosing another professor.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

5/100

Getting an A appears very difficult because the only reported grade is D+ and the .

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

10/100

The course feels very difficult because as unclear and outside help was needed to understand questions.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review .

The single , and there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

0/100

The student explicitly recommends taking any other professor because of poor help and harsh requirements.

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

5/100

The review says missing required pseudocode and flowcharts can result in a zero regardless of other work.

Format shift

Only the .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

The workload is not fully described, but strict required formats and .

Format shift

Only the in-person review provides workload evidence.

Teaching experience

Awful

5/100

The only student says help was minimal and answers mostly redirected them to the book.

Format shift

Only the in-person review evaluates teaching.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

85/100

The review and tags emphasize quizzes and tests more than assignments.

Format shift

Only the in-person review mentions assessment style.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The , and strict format requirements.

Main concern

Students may receive little guidance and lose major credit for not following required pseudocode and flowchart rules.

What students said

“Offered almost no help when asked most responses boiled down to "Read the book".”
CISP300
“Forces you to use pseudocode and flowcharts not doing so will result in a 0 no matter what.”
CISP300

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews , but the assessment experience sounds strict and test-heavy.

Test HeavyUnclear Quiz Questions

Assessment risk

Strict

20/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The and a test-heavy course but does not clearly prove exam format or proctoring rules.

Test HeavyUnclear Quiz Questions
“I often had to use as they made little no sense even consulting other programmers.”
CISP300

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

5/100

“Offered almost no help when asked most responses boiled down to "Read the book".”

⚖️

5/100

“Forces you to use pseudocode and flowcharts not doing so will result in a 0 no matter what.”

👎 Recommendation Level

0/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Offered almost no help when asked most responses boiled down to "Read the book".

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Forces you to use pseudocode and flowcharts not doing so will result in a 0 no matter what.
  • I often had to use as they made little no sense even consulting other programmers.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there is only one detailed review, though its negative evidence is specific.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CISP3001 review

Reported outcomes

D range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values