AI Rate Professor

Theater

Paul Jacques

THART120 · THART100 · THART226 · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
60/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
47.06%
Difficulty
1.5

The decision

if you want an easy theater grade and can tolerate inconsistent organization and mixed teaching quality.

Best fit · Easy A HunterVery easy gradingDisorganized structurePolarizing teachingFun but inconsistentSafety concerns
  • Grades are usually easy, with many A and A+ outcomes and mentions of or few graded items.
  • Student opinion is and serious complaints about disengagement and classroom support.
  • The and prioritize an easy theater credit.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

93/100

Most reported grades are A or A+, and students repeatedly describe easy grading, , and few graded items.

All grade and effort evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online evidence.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

84/100

Theater content is described as easy to pass and often basic, though the teaching can feel vague or unstructured.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Participation matters in many reviews, and one .

Only in-person reviews discuss participation and .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Students are split between strong praise for his personality and strong warnings about disorganization, support, and professionalism.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

92/100

Grades are very lenient, with many A-range outcomes and comments about easy grading, , and few graded items.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

80/100

Students often describe few graded items and easy passing, though participation and productions may matter.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

He is praised as passionate and fun by some students but criticized by many others as , and unsupportive.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Reviews point to participation, scene work, papers, production reviews, and few .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

but highly polarizing class, with praise for fun personality and criticism of poor structure, phone use, and lack of support.

Main concern

Students repeatedly report disorganization, disengagement, and unsafe or unsupported learning conditions.

What students said

“His classes are easy to pass though.”
THART120
“Save your money and your mental health and !”
THART226
“Easy class to pass, and I think he's a great teacher for more specialized parts of theater.”
THART100

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Save your money and your mental health and !”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

📈 Easy Grade

93/100

“His classes are easy to pass though.”

🎭 Polarizing Teaching

55/100

“He's very passionate and fun.”

⚠️ Student Concern

35/100

“He is always on his phone, never gives adequate feedback, allows unsafe learning environments, and openly berates students who bring up these issues.”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Super easy class, you get out of it what you put in.
  • The grading was really easy with given.
  • He's an but .

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • It's more like learning through osmosis than being taught.
  • Paul's class is all flash and no substance.
  • He is very personable and teaches the material in an interesting and engaging way.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Support & Professionalism

  • He gives mediocre directing, is always on his phone, and provides no support for students when they're being harassed in the program.
  • I was left wondering why I should care when he clearly doesn't.
  • Just overall disappointing.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Seventeen reviews across several years give detailed and consistent evidence of but sharply mixed teaching experiences.

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 58

Course coverage

THART12012 reviews
THART2263 reviews
THART1002 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

17 reported outcomes

A range

16

A+ 6 · A 10

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values