AI Rate Professor

Medicine

Dave Molloy

EMS02094 · EMS02092 · EMS020 · EMT2095 · 36 lifetime ratings

AI rating
89/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

if you want to truly learn EMS and are ready to read, study, attend, and meet high expectations.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerRespected EMS expertClear expectationsHeavy readingFair but demandingSupportive mentor
  • Students unanimously respect him as an excellent EMS instructor with strong real-world experience.
  • The course is demanding and reading-heavy, but students say and strong support.
  • Grades feel fair, not easy, because success , and effort.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

48/100

Good grades are realistic, but students , and sustained effort.

Online evidence stresses independent reading, while can lead to failure.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

The EMS material is fast, serious, and stressful even though and keeps lectures engaging.

, while online reviews also describe book-heavy learning.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

as formally mandatory, but students repeatedly warn that missing lecture makes passing much harder.

, while one online review notes flexibility for life issues.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

97/100

because he is knowledgeable, fair, supportive, and deeply committed to student success.

Both formats recommend him, but .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

to doing the required work rather than generosity.

Format shift

In-person reviews repeatedly describe fair but , while online reviews also call him fair.

Workload

Heavy

26/100

Reviews frequently mention heavy reading, consistent studying, long lectures, and substantial outside work.

Format shift

In-person reviews show the heaviest workload, while online .

Teaching experience

Excellent

98/100

Students consistently describe him as , and grounded in real EMS experience.

Format shift

Both formats praise his teaching, with .

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Reviews mention assignments, reading, quizzes, tests, mock testing, skills work, and study guides rather than one single assessment type.

Format shift

Online reviews mention assignments and tests, while , and skills preparation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

34 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews , and professional EMS experience, while stressing serious workload.

Main concern

Students who do not read, attend, and study consistently can fail.

What students said

“YOU HAVE TO READ. This class is no joke.”
EMS02092
“Be ready to spend most if not all of your time invested in this class.”
EMS020

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews describe a fair, supportive instructor who gives schedules, real-world examples, and .

Main concern

Online students may need to rely heavily on the book and self-study.

What students said

“his lectures were a foundation, but it was mainly on us to read and learn the material from the book.”
EMS020
“He is very fair and uses his discretion when people run into life issues when in his class and cannot attend lectures.”
EMS02092

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

preparation support but no explicit open-book or proctoring evidence.

TestsQuizzesMock TestingStudy GuidesNo Surprise Expectations

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and study guides, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, or proctoring policy.

QuizzesTestsMock TestingStudy Guides
“I rarely felt unprepared for the .”
EMS02094
“ ”
EMS020

Online

Online reviews mention upcoming assignments and tests but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, quiz format, midterm format, or .

AssignmentsTests
“He gives us a schedule, advice on ”
EMS020

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“There are certainly easier EMS professors, but you will not find a better one at Crafton.”

Voice snapshots generated from 36 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, fairness, and EMS preparation. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

98/100

“Professor Molloy is the period”

📚 Workload Reality

26/100

“YOU HAVE TO READ. This class is no joke.”

⚖️ Fair Standards

58/100

“ but fair and as long as you do your part you will have no problem in this class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Class is very interactive and fun.
  • His lectures are interactive and .
  • He lectured and taught in a fun and understanding way.
  • He gives us real world examples to help paint the picture.

Theme 2

📚 About Difficulty & Workload

  • Get ready to study consistently and go the extra mile.
  • Be ready to spend most if not all of your time invested in this class.
  • EMT class is by far the hardest thing I have ever done.
  • This made for a lot of work outside of class.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support & Fairness

  • He will do everything in his power to help you succeed.
  • He will be there to support you and expects you to put the time and effort in and he matches that effort just as much.
  • and phone, and always took the time to answer questions.
  • He is very fair and uses his discretion when people run into life issues when in his class and cannot attend lectures.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

36

Recent reviews read by the AI

36

Lifetime ratings

98/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-six consistent reviews across many years give detailed evidence , and course expectations.

Inside 36 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 536
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

EMS0209218 reviews
EMS02016 reviews
EMS020941 review
EMT20951 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

33 reported outcomes

A range

16

A+ 1 · A 12 · A- 3

B range

17

B+ 6 · B 10 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values