AI Rate Professor

History

Lindsay Weiler-Leon

HIST101 · HISTORY100 · HIST171 · HIST100 · HIST101H20 · HISTORY101 · HIST170 · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
16/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
15%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid this professor unless , and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderLate gradingHeavy readingUnclear feedbackTest heavy
  • , and unclear expectations.
  • , and group work carrying major grade weight.
  • A few students found her passionate or clear, but the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

25/100

Getting an A appears difficult because students report , and little useful feedback.

Both formats report hard grading, with and locked expectations.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The content is not impossible, but , and essay exams make the course feel demanding.

and tests, while online evidence emphasizes confusing instructions and heavy projects.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

Several in-person reviews say attendance, participation, or group work strongly affects passing and grades.

, while online reviews do not clearly prove an attendance policy.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Most students warn against taking her because , and organization is poor.

Both online and few older in-person positive exceptions.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

Students repeatedly call her a tough, nitpicky, and .

Format shift

, but the strongest volume of evidence is in person.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Reviews mention lots of , and intense summer pacing.

Format shift

Online reviews highlight heavy projects and locked work, while , and essays.

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

Most comments , and weak communication despite a few positive reviews.

Format shift

Online reviews focus on organization and responsiveness problems, while , and feedback.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

74/100

Grades , and a few major graded items.

Format shift

, and essays, while online reviews mention midterm and final confusion.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews mostly , and stressful quizzes or essay exams.

Main concern

and make grades hard to recover.

What students said

“She waited until the last week of the semester ”
HIST101
“ and even worse lecturer.”
HIST171

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews describe confusing , and heavy honors-level workload.

Main concern

Students may not know expectations or grades until very late.

What students said

“Graded everything unreasonably late, never knew my true grade.”
HIST112
“ so you can't see what is expected of the student and can't get ahead”
HIST101H20

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and harshly graded essay midterms and finals, with no clear proof of proctoring or open-book policies.

Essay ExamsBiweekly QuizzesHarsh GradingTest Heavy

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

midterms and finals, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules.

Biweekly QuizzesEssay MidtermEssay FinalHarsh Grading
“Mid term and .”
HIST170
“ and finals.”
HISTORY100

Online

and but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Confusing Midterm InstructionsFinal Depended On Midterm Feedback
“ so confusing.”
HIST112
“Didn't grade my midterm until 2 days before the final”
HIST112

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This professor was one of the most frustrating professors I've had yet.”

Voice snapshots generated from 20 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and communication. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“She doesn't do real lectures.”

⚖️

12/100

“ and even worse lecturer.”

📚 Workload Pressure

22/100

“She would have 5 assignments posted per week that were very time consuming.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She doesn't do real lectures.
  • She doesn't stay on topic during the lectures, her class is very boring.
  • Simply while ranting about the most minute details not covered on the tests.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • Getting your grade back up is a struggle.
  • I was unable to meet W-L's expectations, because they are out of touch with constraints of reality.

Theme 3

🧾

  • Waits till the very end to grade most things.
  • Does not give feedback on why you receive the grade on the assignments.
  • Never responded to almost all my emails.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

20

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The judgment is credible because 20 reviews span many years and repeatedly describe the , and .

Inside 20 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 56
1 out of 510

Course coverage

HIST1018 reviews
HIST1005 reviews
HISTORY1003 reviews
HIST101H201 review
HIST1701 review
Show 2 more courses
HIST1711 review
HISTORY1011 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

16 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

9

B+ 2 · B 7

C range

4

C+ 2 · C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1