AI Rate Professor

Social Science

Rebecca Bailey

CD132 · CD182 · CD105 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
76/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
72.73%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you want a caring professor and are willing to keep up with writing, participation, and deadlines.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaringAmazing lecturesParticipation mattersWriting heavyMixed workload
  • Most students praise Bailey as caring, helpful, passionate, and clear.
  • Students should expect , and participation-based work.
  • late policies and heavy workload.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

67/100

Good grades are realistic, but students say you must write in , and meet deadlines.

grades, while online evidence includes stricter workload complaints.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

The and real-life examples, but writing and detail requirements add challenge.

, while online reviews are more divided on workload and flexibility.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Participation matters often appears, but reviews do not show a .

Both formats mention participation or lecture attention, but neither clearly proves a .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

75/100

Most students recommend her because , and clear, though workload and policies can be demanding.

, while online reviews are more polarized.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Grades seem fair but not automatic, with full credit tied to detailed work and deadlines.

Format shift

In-person reviews show fair effort-for-grade outcomes, while online reviews and late policies.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

The , and sometimes about three assignments per week.

Format shift

In-person and online reviews both mention workload, but online comments conflict between reasonable and overwhelming.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Most students describe her as caring, passionate, helpful, and .

Format shift

In-person evidence is consistently positive, while online evidence includes both very positive and very negative experiences.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment appears to , and exams.

Format shift

, and open-book exams, while online reviews mention quizzes and papers.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and clear real-life examples while noting writing and participation demands.

Main concern

Students , and quizzes to earn full credit.

What students said

“Professor Bailey cares for her student's Her lectures are pretty straightforward.”
CD182
“About 3 assignments due a week.”
CD132

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are split between highly supportive comments and complaints about strict policies and heavy papers.

Main concern

Late work and .

What students said

“I believe the workload was reasonable I never got overwhelmed by the work.”
CD132
“Does not work with students or follows her own late policy.”
CD132

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Supported comments describe open-book or take-home exams and webcam rules.

Open Book ExamsTake-Home ExamsReasonable Quizzes

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

be taken from home and an unusual final format.

Open Book ExamsTaken From HomePotluck Final
“ and can be taken from home.”
CD105
“In person, for the .”
CD132

Online

, but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Reasonable Quizzes
“The as long as you are paying attention to the lectures.”
CD132

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Bailey cares for her student's Her lectures are pretty straightforward.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“ and considerate and helpful.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

75/100

“ .”

📝 Workload Balance

50/100

“Expect to work for and and expect to go in to detail in order to get full credit.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She's passionate about what she teaches.
  • The teacher provided real life scenarios that helped us connect with the course.
  • I loved this professor

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Expect to work for and .
  • .
  • a lot of writing in person class is lecture only.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Mixed Experiences

  • .
  • Does not work with students or follows her own late policy.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

The 11 reviews are recent enough and detailed, though the online section is more mixed than the in-person section.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CD1055 reviews
CD1325 reviews
CD1821 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 2 · A 1 · A- 1

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 2 · B- 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Incomplete 1