AI Rate Professor

Communication

James Urbanovich

COMMST178 · COMM174 · SPEEC174 · COMM101 · SPEEC101 · SPEEC111 · COMM140 · COMM125 · COMM135 · COMMST135 · SPCH125 · SPCH100 · SPCH101 · COMM111 · COMM100 · COMMST125 · 88 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
30.77%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Avoid him unless you are comfortable with , and a highly unpredictable classroom dynamic.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPolarizing personalityHarsh feedbackStrict attendanceUnclear gradingParticipation-heavy
  • Reviews are extremely polarized, but , and uncomfortable classroom behavior.
  • Positive reviews praise humor, support, growth in speaking skills, and .
  • Attendance, participation, speeches, presentations, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Some students earn A grades with manageable assignments, but , and harsh feedback make the A unreliable.

Online reviews include some easier A experiences, while and subjective grading can damage grades.

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

The content is usually not intellectually hard, but speeches, reading, presentations, and .

Online work can be manageable but vague, while and classroom dynamics.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

and punctuality matter heavily, with penalties for absences or lateness.

, while online reviews mention participation more than physical attendance.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

31/100

The low recommendation comes from repeated reports of , and harsh feedback despite some strong positive experiences.

Both formats are mixed, but and the strongest attendance concerns.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

Students often describe tough, unclear, subjective, or and participation.

Format shift

, while online reviews add concerns about vague instructions and grade changes.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Workload varies by course, ranging from light discussion posts to lots of reading, papers, speeches, projects, and weekly assignments.

Format shift

Online workload is mixed but often assignment-heavy, while , and participation.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Positive reviews praise humor and support, but many reviews describe disrespect, humiliation, poor boundaries, and .

Format shift

In-person comments drive the poor score because they contain the most repeated classroom conduct concerns, while online reviews are mixed.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Grades appear to rely mostly on speeches, , and occasional tests.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize discussions, homework, and projects, while , and attendance.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

42 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are highly polarized, with repeated concerns about public embarrassment, strict attendance, and .

Main concern

The biggest risk is a harsh classroom atmosphere and .

What students said

“Humiliates people in front of the class and plays it off as a joke!”
COMM100
“2 absences will mark you down a letter grade and 3 you're dropped.”
COMM101

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed, with some students praising support and structure while others , and grade disputes.

Main concern

Online students often need to manage vague directions and inconsistent support outside class.

What students said

“all of his instructions online are vague and ”
COMM125
“Not too much work, just the usual amount.”
COMM100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and inconsistent, with some student-friendly online tests or finals mentioned but , and participation.

Online Final With Notes MentionedTwo Small Online Tests MentionedSpeeches And Projects More Central Than Exams

Assessment risk

Varies

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a , but do not show a consistent exam policy across courses.

Online Final With NotesSmall Online TestsClass Speeches
“ and help.”
COMM111
“ as a class (both online).”
COMM100

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or and participation references.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and time.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“He was a really good teacher and .”

⚠️ Classroom Risk

31/100

“Humiliates people in front of the class and plays it off as a joke!”

📌

12/100

“2 absences will mark you down a letter grade and 3 you're dropped.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He cares about his students and wants them to improve on their public speaking skills!
  • Humiliates people in front of the class and plays it off as a joke!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • Absolutely no late work allowed.
  • Class is super easy if you are on top of your speeches.

Theme 3

💬 About Student Experience

  • I got an A, but was left feeling more insecure about public speaking than I did before.
  • The class feels more like a family than just peers

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

88

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 50 reviews over a long time span, with repeated and detailed patterns despite strongly polarized opinions.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 535
4 out of 58
3 out of 59
2 out of 54
1 out of 532

Course coverage

COMM10020 reviews
COMM1745 reviews
COMM1254 reviews
COMM1354 reviews
COMM1013 reviews
Show 11 more courses
COMMST1253 reviews
SPCH1002 reviews
COMM1111 review
COMM1401 review
COMMST1351 review
COMMST1781 review
SPCH1011 review
SPCH1251 review
SPEEC1011 review
SPEEC1111 review
SPEEC1741 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

45 reported outcomes

A range

18

A+ 6 · A 9 · A- 3

B range

5

B+ 1 · B 3 · B- 1

C range

4

C+ 2 · C 1 · C- 1

D range

1

D 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

16

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 8 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 6