AI Rate Professor

Communication

Amy Wassing

COMM111 · COMMST111 · COMMST125 · COMST111 · COM100 · COMMST100 · COMM100 · COM111 · COMMST110 · 57 lifetime ratings

AI rating
43/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
60%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Take her only if you can follow detailed instructions, meet deadlines, and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough graderClear expectationsGroup projectsParticipation mattersPolarizing communication
  • Reviews are sharply split between and helpful and students who describe her as rude or harsh.
  • Many students say grades depend on following instructions exactly, meeting deadlines, and handling speeches or group work.
  • Recent online reviews are notably .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

46/100

An A is possible, but students repeatedly say strict grading, precise instructions, speeches, and deadlines make it costly.

Online sections look harder and harsher, while but still require participation.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

The content is manageable communication work, but speeches, readings, papers, and .

Online reviews emphasize workload and stress, while as .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Participation and , and success in the class.

, while online reviews show strict weekly module and deadline expectations.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Recommendation depends heavily on format and personality fit because praise for organization is balanced by many strong complaints about harshness.

Online recommendation is weak in recent reviews, while but still mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

because many reviews describe point deductions for details, tough standards, and harsh penalties.

Format shift

Online reviews show the harshest grading complaints, while but still demanding.

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Workload is heavy because students mention , and strict deadlines.

Format shift

Online workload is described as harder to balance, while as manageable with effort.

Teaching experience

Average

56/100

Teaching quality is mixed because students praise organization and feedback but often criticize rude or passive-aggressive communication.

Format shift

Online teaching experience has more recent negative tone, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Assessment centers on speeches, presentations, papers, group work, participation, and projects more than traditional exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize assignments and speeches, with online reviews adding recorded group work and weekly modules.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

27 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are more positive overall, especially older ones, with praise for , and a more engaging classroom.

Main concern

Attendance, participation, speeches, and .

What students said

“Great teacher. Speeches can be hard, but .”
COMMST100
“when we were required to .”
COMM111
“This teacher does not care about her students whatsoever.”
COM111

Remote format

Online

23 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are highly polarized, with some praise for and feedback but many recent complaints about rude communication and .

Main concern

, and difficult communication are the main online risks.

What students said

“No late work. !!!!!”
COMMST100
“Her .”
COMMST111
“She is a and is very particular about random things.”
COM100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus more on speeches and projects than exams, and .

SpeechesPresentationsGroup RecordingsMidterm MentionedOnline Midterm Mentioned

Assessment risk

Varies

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention speeches, presentations, a , and an online midterm, but do not clearly prove closed-book or .

SpeechesGroup Project FinalOnline Midterm
“Group project is the final and 1 speech which is super easy to handle. .”
COM111
“The and it was online.”
COMMST111

Online

Online reviews mention speeches, group recordings, modules, and projects, but do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book, midterm, or .

Recorded SpeechesGroup RecordingsWeekly Modules
“ .”
COMMST100
“5 speeches in the class; hated all of them, very random topics.”
COM100

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you follow her instructions exactly and pay CLOSE ATTENTION to due dates, you should get an 'A' in class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

⚖️

28/100

“She is a and is very particular about random things.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

56/100

“Her .”

👍 Recommendation Level

45/100

“ . As long as you do the work and show up, you're golden.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • Her .
  • Has a hard time respecting students when replying to emails and belittles you

Theme 2

📚 About Workload and Grading

  • There was a lot of work.
  • she didn't miss a .
  • As long as you do the work and show up, you're golden.

Theme 3

🎤 About Speeches and Projects

  • .
  • Speeches can be hard, but .
  • and 1 speech which is super easy to handle.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

57

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 50 reviews include recent detailed comments across online and in-person formats, though opinions are highly polarized.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 526
4 out of 59
3 out of 54
2 out of 53
1 out of 516

Course coverage

COMMST10012 reviews
COM10010 reviews
COMMST11110 reviews
COMM1118 reviews
COM1113 reviews
Show 4 more courses
COMM1003 reviews
COMMST1102 reviews
COMMST1251 review
COMST1111 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

48 reported outcomes

A range

24

A+ 7 · A 13 · A- 4

B range

11

B+ 1 · B 9 · B- 1

C range

6

C+ 2 · C 1 · C- 3

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

6

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 3 · Rather not say 1