AI Rate Professor

Education

Meridyth McLaren

CD105CD115 · CD205 · CD10570 · CD295 · CD · CDCD · CD126 · CD105 · CD186 · 47 lifetime ratings

AI rating
57/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
57.14%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you can, stay organized yourself, and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardEngaging lecturesDisorganized gradingSlow communicationAttendance mattersOnline risk
  • In-person students often like her lectures and personality, but and .
  • Online reviews are much , and unclear course management.
  • Getting an A is , and track their own work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

67/100

An A is realistic if students attend, study notes, complete observations or papers, and keep track of missing grades themselves.

In-person reviews provide most easy-A evidence, while .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

The content is usually described as simple or manageable, but , and observations still require steady attention.

In-person reviews call the class easier when students attend, while online students report more confusion from course setup.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

as formally mandatory, but many students say missing class hurts test preparation and grades.

, while online reviews focus more on communication and grading.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

but hesitate because of late grading, weak communication, and online problems.

, while online reviews are mostly cautionary.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Some students mention and , but many complain about late, tough, or inconsistent grading.

Format shift

Online , while in-person reviews show more mixed but .

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Workload is usually manageable with notes, tests, observations, and papers, but some students report .

Format shift

Online reviews mention lots of , while and test preparation.

Teaching experience

Average

64/100

Her lectures can be fun, relatable, and caring, but disorganization and slow responses sharply reduce the experience.

Format shift

Teaching quality appears stronger in person and weaker online.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

, and assignments rather than one single assessment type.

Format shift

and observations, while online reviews mention assignments and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

39 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are stronger, with many students praising her personality and lectures while still noting organization issues.

Main concern

, and self-tracking matter because grades and .

What students said

“Her lectures were interesting and funny.”
CD105
“ .”
CD10570

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are polarized but mostly warn , and .

Main concern

Students may not know where they stand because grades and .

What students said

“she was never present, when I would email her she NEVER got back to me.”
CD10570
“She has graded 2 assignments and and calls.”
CD105

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence suggests mostly standard tests supported by notes, SI, review sheets, or .

Multiple Choice TestsStudy GuidesOnline Test OptionReview Sheets

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and some online test options, but do not clearly prove strict proctoring or open-book rules.

Multiple Choice TestsReview SheetsOnline Test Option
“Everything on the review sheets will be on the exam.”
CD105
“ !!”
CD105

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, Lockdown Browser, midterm, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you can, stay organized yourself, and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 46 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

64/100

“Her lectures were interesting and funny.”

⚖️

48/100

“ .”

👍 Recommendation Split

55/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • I love her personality and is passionate about the subject.
  • Her lectures were interesting and funny.
  • She is very friendly and helpful.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades

  • Study and it's an easy A.
  • Had a B then when grades were due she didn't have anything done and I ended with a D?
  • She has graded 2 assignments and and calls.

Theme 3

🧭 About Organization

  • don't expect your grade to be updated frequently :/
  • She grades everything last minute and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

46

Recent reviews read by the AI

47

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The profile has 46 reviews across many years and formats with consistent , and .

Inside 46 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 515
4 out of 512
3 out of 57
2 out of 57
1 out of 55

Course coverage

CD10531 reviews
CD3 reviews
CD105CD1153 reviews
CD105702 reviews
CD1862 reviews
Show 5 more courses
1051 review
CD1261 review
CD2051 review
CD2951 review
CDCD1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

16 reported outcomes

A range

11

A+ 1 · A 10

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 1