AI Rate Professor

English

Cassundra White-Elliott

ENG102 · ENG010 · ENG101 · ENG015 · 22 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
11.11%
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

Avoid this professor unless you , and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh gradingUnclear instructionsHeavy writing loadMany long papersStressful course
  • Most recent reviews describe the class as , and harshly graded.
  • Students repeatedly report long papers, heavy writing, vague rubrics, and severe citation penalties.
  • A few older or positive reviews praise her rigor, but they are outweighed by repeated recent complaints.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Getting an A appears possible for strong students, but it requires heavy writing, strict citation compliance, and tolerance for .

Both formats show harsh grading, with online reviews giving especially strong evidence of automatic zeros and .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

16/100

Students repeatedly say an introductory English course feels far harder than expected because of , and .

Online reviews sound most severe, while and stress.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Attendance flexibility is not consistently documented, but one and another says participation or showing up matters.

Online evidence mentions an optional question day, while and participation expectations.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Most students do not recommend her because the , and .

, though online reviews are more consistently negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

8/100

Students repeatedly report , and low average scores.

Format shift

Online reviews provide the strongest harsh-grading evidence, while .

Workload

Overwhelming

10/100

The workload is repeatedly described as excessive, with many papers, long essays, and frequent assignments.

Format shift

Online and online comments especially intense.

Teaching experience

Awful

22/100

Most recent students say , and does not teach the required formats well.

Format shift

Online teaching is described as confusing and , while but many recent negative ones.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Grades appear driven mainly , and citation-heavy coursework.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize papers and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mixed historically but recent comments strongly , and .

Main concern

The main and limited useful feedback.

What students said

“Expect 10+ page assignments on the regular.”
ENG102
“Ive written more papers in just this one semester than I did all of high school.”
ENG101
“she expects everything to be picture perfect and if you mess up once it's an automatic zero”
ENG101

Remote format

Online

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews are highly negative and focus on unclear , and confusing Canvas organization.

Main concern

The and excessive writing.

What students said

“ ever had to drop out of she doesn't provide a and only gives vague instructions”
ENG101
“If you miss one citation on your pages you get a big fat 0.”
ENG101
“Be ready to write 10-15 page papers.”
ENG102

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mostly describe papers and assignments, and they do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam, open-book, midterm, or .

Paper-Based AssessmentVideo SubmissionsExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and one beginning test, but do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, midterm format, or .

Long PapersBeginning TestPolicy Not Clearly Proven
“at the beginning we had to take a to knowing about the writing formats she would be teaching us.”
ENG102
“Expect 10+ page assignments on the regular.”
ENG102

Online

Online reviews mention Canvas assignments, papers, and video submissions, but do not clearly prove .

Canvas AssignmentsLong PapersVideo SubmissionsPolicy Not Clearly Proven
“Her class was so hard, the average .”
ENG101
“Half of the ”
ENG101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ever had to drop out of she doesn't provide a and only gives vague instructions”

Voice snapshots generated from 22 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

22/100

“she grades so hard yet teaches you nothing.”

⚖️

8/100

“If you miss one citation on your pages you get a big fat 0.”

📚 Workload Load

10/100

“Ive written more papers in just this one semester than I did all of high school.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her instructions are very unclear for the most important assignments like essays which she grades harshly on with .
  • there was no actual teaching of the formats she wanted us to use.
  • Dr. Elliott teaches very well and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you do not follow her vague outline of what she considers correct then your grade will tank.
  • she expects everything to be picture perfect and if you mess up once it's an automatic zero
  • My classes and video presentations is always below a D grade.

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • All her papers are 10 pages which I've done before and I thought cool I can do this, no.
  • Expect to write a paper every 1-2 weeks thats 5 pages each.
  • 10-15 page papers are her jam

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

22

Recent reviews read by the AI

22

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-two reviews across many years, with 11 online and 11 in-person reviews, show strong and repeated recent patterns.

Inside 22 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 515

Course coverage

ENG10117 reviews
ENG1023 reviews
ENG0101 review
ENG0151 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

15 reported outcomes

A range

7

A 5 · A- 2

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

3

C 3

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 1