AI Rate Professor

English

STACY LAPOINTE

ENG102 · ENG010 · ENG101 · ENGL10276 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
45/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

if you can handle weak structure and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProKind but inconsistentSlow gradingPoor online communicationLenient deadlinesUnorganized
  • In-person students are mixed but , and sometimes enjoyable.
  • Online students report serious problems with , and disappearing for long periods.
  • The course can be easy, but the experience depends heavily on format and organization.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Grades can be strong and deadlines may be lenient, but and online disorganization add real risk.

In-person evidence supports an easier A through lenient due dates, while and tougher workload concerns.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

Several students found the assignments easy, but , and uneven structure can make the class feel harder than the content itself.

In-person classes sound more manageable and discussion-based, while and communication gaps.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

72/100

Reviews mention canceled classes, flexible homework, and extensions, but do not show a .

In-person evidence suggests flexibility through cancellations and extensions, while online evidence focuses more .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

but online reviews strongly warn about being ignored and .

In-person reviews lean mixed-positive, while online reviews are clearly negative and drive the recommendation down.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

, and lenient due dates suggest flexible grading despite some tough-grader complaints.

Format shift

In-person reviews support leniency more clearly, while and delayed grade visibility.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Some students describe easy assignments and few essays, but online reviews mention lots of homework and reading.

Format shift

, while online workload is more concerning.

Teaching experience

Poor

50/100

Kindness is a strength, but repeated reports of being absent, late, and .

Format shift

In-person teaching is mixed and sometimes good, while online teaching is repeatedly described as missing and unresponsive.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

The class , and assignments rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats point to writing and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and lenient deadlines but criticism of disorganization and canceled classes.

Main concern

Organization and .

What students said

“Lenient on due dates”
ENG101
“Shes nice but unorganized.”
ENG010
“ and if you ask for them.”
ENG101

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, , and one direct recommendation against taking her.

Main concern

Students may go weeks without updates, grades, or .

What students said

“ ”
ENG102
“This professor was so MIA the whole semester!”
ENG102
“ .”
ENGL10276

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, , and assessment appears essay-based.

Exam Policy Not Clearly ProvenEssay-Based Assessment

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and reading but do not clearly describe exams, proctoring, open-book rules, midterms, or finals.

Essay-Based AssessmentExam Policy Not Clearly Proven
“I think there were only 2 essays in her class & the first one was about yourself.”
ENG101

Online

Online reviews do not clearly describe exams, proctoring, .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Shes nice but unorganized.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“The teacher was real difficult to get a hold of throughout the semester.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

48/100

“ ”

⚖️

70/100

“Lenient on due dates”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very kind.
  • !
  • Shes a great teacher but be prepared for her long talks.

Theme 2

⏳

  • She went on a number of hiatus for weeks at a time where we didnt hear from her
  • She also takes forever to grade.
  • We did not even know our grades until the last minute.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload & Grades

  • Only "hw" we got .
  • Most of .
  • The class itself wasnt too difficult.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Eight reviews across several years give useful contrast by format, though opinions are inconsistent and some reviews are brief.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENG1014 reviews
ENG1022 reviews
ENG0101 review
ENGL102761 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

2

B+ 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values