AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Jonathan Dugan

C100016C · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
11/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

unless you can learn independently and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProQuiet LecturerPoor Classroom ControlHeavy HomeworkTough GradingDisorganized Grades
  • Students say he speaks too quietly and struggles to control the classroom.
  • Workload and .
  • Both reviews strongly discourage taking the class.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Getting an A looks difficult because students report , and delayed grade information.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

The course content itself is not described as advanced, but lecture delivery and organization make it harder to manage.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Reviews do not clearly state an , so flexibility cannot be confirmed.

Only in-person reviews exist, and they do not clearly prove the .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Students strongly discourage taking him because of quiet teaching, weak classroom control, heavy work, and poor grade communication.

All recommendation evidence is negative and comes from in-person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Students tag him as a and say grades were not updated until the end of the semester.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Both reviews include lots of .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention workload.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Students describe quiet lectures, poor classroom control, weak technology use, and sleepy classes.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

, and being graded by few things.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews describe quiet lectures, poor classroom control, heavy work, and late grade updates.

Main concern

Students may struggle to hear, follow, and .

What students said

“I could hardly hear Mr. Dugan; he talks so quietly and doesn't seem to know how to run a classroom.”
C1000-16C
“This class will 1000% put you to sleep, he talks to quietly and has no control over the class.”
C1000-16C

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention scratch-off tests and , but do not clearly prove the .

Scratch-Off TestsMakeup Tests Mentioned

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention scratch-off tests and makeup opportunities, but .

Scratch-Off TestsMakeup Tests Mentioned
“The , so that was fun.”
C1000-16C
“ the students in my class were sick”
C1000-16C

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This class will 1000% put you to sleep, he talks to quietly and has no control over the class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“I could hardly hear Mr. Dugan; he talks so quietly and doesn't seem to know how to run a classroom.”

⚖️

25/100

“Mr. Dugan did not update grades all semester until last night.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

8/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • I could hardly hear Mr. Dugan; he talks so quietly and doesn't seem to know how to run a classroom.
  • This class will 1000% put you to sleep, he talks to quietly and has no control over the class.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload And Grading

  • Mr. Dugan did not update grades all semester until last night.
  • The , so that was fun.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only , but they are consistent and specific.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

C1000-16C2 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1