AI Rate Professor

Physics

Anh Nguyen

Courses not reported · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
70/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you can handle imperfect lectures and want and corrections.

Best fit · Effort For RewardTest CorrectionsLecture HeavyMixed HelpfulnessDifficult Tests
  • Grades are strong, but students describe very different support experiences.
  • Tests can be difficult, but and .
  • All evidence comes from in-person Physics 250 reviews.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

A grades are common and , but difficult tests mean the A still requires steady preparation.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Physics 250 feels harder because and tests are difficult, even when passing is manageable.

All course-easiness evidence comes from in-person Physics 250 reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Participation matters appears in reviews, but comments do not clearly prove a .

, and there is no online evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

and corrections, but the negative help experience keeps confidence limited.

Recommendation evidence is entirely in person and sharply mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

and strong reported grades make grading .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Workload signals conflict between lots of homework and , so the overall load looks moderate.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload, and they disagree.

Teaching experience

Average

68/100

Teaching ranges from amazing and helpful to dismissive and confusing, so the blended experience is mixed.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Grades appear driven by exams, labs, participation, and .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are split between a very negative support experience and positive reports of .

Main concern

Support outside class may feel inconsistent.

What students said

“Had to get help from another physics professor on how to do the .”
250
“ , but ”
250
“ so you can earn points ”
250

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are difficult but student-friendly and .

Difficult TestsPractice TestsTest Corrections

Assessment risk

Standard

68/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention difficult tests, practice-test alignment, and , but do not clearly prove proctoring or .

Difficult TestsPractice TestsTest Corrections
“ , but ”
250
“She gives out a practice test and uses those questions ( ”
250

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ so you can earn points ”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

68/100

“ .”

⚖️ Grade Recovery

76/100

“ ”

👍 Recommendation

70/100

“10/10 I definitely recommend her.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • Professor Nguyen was an amazing professor.
  • Did not want to help outside of class.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • , but
  • Class feels way harder than it is, but not hard to pass.
  • She gives out a practice test and uses those questions (

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Only three recent reviews exist, and the comments are detailed but highly split.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

2503 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 2 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values