AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Rosa Davila

MATH102 · MATH110 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
83/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Take her if you want a supportive math instructor and , but if you need tight organization.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring and approachableHomework heavyMixed organizationClear when engagedTest heavy
  • Most students describe her as caring and willing to help, but a few report serious organization and communication problems.
  • Getting an A is realistic with consistent effort, though homework and .
  • but polarized, while the single online review is strongly positive.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

A grades are common and grading can be forgiving, but and A.

The online review suggests passing is easy with attention, while and exams.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

63/100

The math content can be made clear by her explanations, but rushed pacing and .

Online evidence describes the class as easy, while difficult.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Participation appears important, but reviews do not clearly prove a .

Both formats mention participation, but .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

73/100

and clear, though a minority strongly warn about organization and communication.

The only online review is strongly favorable, while but polarized.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Several A grades, , and comments like not too strict on grading point to fairly .

Format shift

, while the online review only supports general manageability.

Workload

Heavy

38/100

Multiple students mention lots of , and lecture-heavy or test-heavy pacing.

Format shift

Workload , while the online review does not report heavy work.

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

and care, but the lowest reviews describe disorganization and poor communication.

Format shift

Online teaching is described positively in one review, while and detailed.

Assessment method

Balanced

65/100

, and difficult exams, so assessment appears mixed but test-leaning.

Format shift

and , while online assessment details are limited.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly positive about care and explanations, but negative , and poor communication.

Main concern

Some students found the course messy, homework-heavy, and harder than lecture examples.

What students said

“She would break down everything and make the lesson easy to understand.”
MATH102
“ in lecture/hw.”
MATH102
“really nice understanding gal, bit much on the .”
MATH110

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The single online review says the class was fun, easy, and manageable with attention.

Main concern

Only one older online review supports this view.

What students said

“She was always on time and meds class fun and easy.”
MATH102
“As long as you pay attention you should be able to pass her class.”
MATH102

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews report difficult and , but they do not clearly prove open-book rules, proctoring, webcam use, or closed-book requirements.

Test HeavyHarder Than HomeworkExam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but specific exam policies are not clearly proven.

Test HeavyHarder Than Homework
“ in lecture/hw.”
MATH102
“ no directions.”
MATH110

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She made it very easy to ask questions. She would break down everything and make the lesson easy to understand.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

76/100

“She would break down everything and make the lesson easy to understand.”

📚 Workload Reality

38/100

“really nice understanding gal, bit much on the .”

👍 Recommendation Level

73/100

“She really cares and wants you to do well! !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She made it very easy to ask questions.
  • She would break down everything and make the lesson easy to understand.
  • making the next 6 weeks a mess.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • in lecture/hw.
  • really nice understanding gal, bit much on the .

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • if you are stuck on something.
  • She never made us feel dumb for not understanding and would answer all questions.
  • She was always on time and meds class fun and easy.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Nine reviews across several years include detailed and consistent themes, though the online sample is very small.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH1025 reviews
MATH1104 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 3

B range

3

B 3

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values