AI Rate Professor

Theater

Nicole Cowans

THART100 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
16/100
RMP rating
1.1/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Avoid this professor unless you , and very poor communication.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPoor communicationUnprofessionalLate gradingUnclear instructionsNot recommended
  • Students across both formats overwhelmingly warn against taking her because communication and .
  • The course content itself may be easy, but , and strict behavior make the experience poor.
  • Online and in-person reviews are consistently negative, with online comments and ignored messages.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Some students earned high grades and call the class easy, but and .

Online includes an A+ but severe process complaints, while but .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

65/100

The material appears easy, but rushed lectures and the content itself.

In-person evidence directly calls the class easy, while online reviews focus more on poor structure than content difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Participation and , and one review says skipping class means you will not pass.

In-person reviews give stronger attendance evidence, while online reviews mention class meetings and removal from Zoom but .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Students overwhelmingly do not recommend her because of , and unprofessional behavior.

Both online and recommendation in either format.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

The issue is less grade difficulty than unreliable, late, and disputed grading that students describe as unfair.

Format shift

Online reviews report unfair or unprofessional grading, while .

Workload

Moderate

48/100

The workload includes papers, tests, quizzes, and assignments, but the main burden is confusion rather than volume alone.

Format shift

In-person reviews mention papers, tests, and quizzes, while .

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Reviews repeatedly describe unclear teaching, ignored messages, unprofessional behavior, and little student support.

Format shift

Both online and is poor.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Assessment appears to mix papers, quizzes, tests, and assignments, but .

Format shift

, and tests, while online reviews mention assignments and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are also strongly negative, with repeated complaints , and poor lecture structure.

Main concern

Grades and , and students report little useful support.

What students said

“Never answers emails or messages, grades very late and does not listen to her students.”
THART100
“The class itself was easy.”
THART100
“ .”
THART100

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are strongly negative, citing unclear teaching, ignored messages, unreliable policies, and unprofessional behavior.

Main concern

Students report , and unreasonable treatment online.

What students said

“The .”
THART100
“ .”
THART100
“Completely ignores DMs and .”
THART100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes and tests, but do not clearly prove exam rules, proctoring, open-book status, webcam use, or .

QuizzesTestsPolicy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Varies

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and tests, but the and exam policy are not clearly proven.

QuizzesTests
“There were 5-6 papers and 3 tests.”
THART100
“ .”
THART100

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Never answers emails or messages, grades very late and does not listen to her students.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🚫 Recommendation Risk

5/100

“ ”

🎯 Teaching Quality

12/100

“She doesn't teach or convey any of the material clearly; some material didn't even fit the class.”

⚖️

20/100

“ .”

Theme 1

📩 About Communication

  • Never answers emails.
  • Completely ignores DMs and .
  • She takes a long while .

Theme 2

⚖️

  • .
  • grades very late and does not listen to her students.
  • only the and the semester is over.

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She doesn't teach or convey any of the material clearly; some material didn't even fit the class.
  • The class itself was easy.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

Seven reviews across multiple years are unusually consistent and detailed in , and professionalism problems.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 56

Course coverage

THART1007 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1