AI Rate Professor

English

David Vonk

ENG102 · ENG002 · ENG095 · ENGL101 · ENG101 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
64/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
71.43%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if you want feedback-heavy writing instruction and , and a polarizing teaching style.

Best fit · Effort For RewardFeedback FocusedParticipation HeavyTough Essay GraderReading HeavyPolarizing Classroom
  • Reviews are sharply split between and students who report disrespectful or uncomfortable classroom experiences.
  • The , and revision rather than passive completion.
  • Essay grading can be hard, but redo opportunities and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

65/100

A , and revisions, but poor deadlines or weak writing effort can hurt quickly.

, while the single online review does not provide enough grade detail.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

The writing content is manageable but , and repeated essay work.

, and participation, while online evidence only confirms an interactive format.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Attendance and punctuality are repeatedly described as important, and participation is part of the class experience.

In-person reviews clearly show attendance pressure, while online evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

63/100

, but negative reports about classroom conduct create real hesitation.

The single online review is positive, while and include serious negative experiences.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

, but , and clear expectations can make grades fair for students who revise.

Format shift

, while online reviews do not clearly establish grading leniency.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Students report , and participation, but not an overwhelming workload.

Format shift

and weekly readings, while online evidence only notes reading and group work tags.

Teaching experience

Average

61/100

Teaching quality is polarizing, with strong praise for feedback and interaction offset by multiple reports of rude or uncomfortable behavior.

Format shift

but based on one review, while and sharply mixed.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

The course is mainly , and revision rather than exams.

Format shift

and writing work, with in-person reviews giving the clearest assignment evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and growth, while others report rude, uncomfortable, or unsupportive behavior.

Main concern

Several in-person students report disrespect, discomfort, tough grading, and .

What students said

“ but he does give you what you need to fix them and pass the class.”
ENG101
“ .”
ENG101

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The single online review describes a thorough and interactive Zoom class with a caring instructor.

Main concern

The online evidence is too limited to confirm workload or .

What students said

“Professor Vonk was a very thorough & interactive educator.”
ENG102

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a consistent exam policy because , and participation.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam PolicyEssay RedosWriting-Based Assessment

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and participation rather than a clearly described exam policy.

Essay RedosPapersParticipation
“We wrote 5 papers, all of them you can redo.”
ENGL101
“You if you get a poor grade and .”
ENGL101

Online

The single online review does not clearly .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ but he does give you what you need to fix them and pass the class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and classroom experience. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

61/100

“Professor Vonk was a very thorough & interactive educator.”

⚖️

58/100

“You if you get a poor grade and .”

⚠️ Classroom Concerns

37/100

“I dropped out of his class after being publicly humiliated by being named called multiple times.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Vonk really cares about his students.
  • He uses it all the time and .
  • He occasionally gives rude remarks to his students.

Theme 2

✍️ About Writing & Grades

  • We wrote 5 papers, all of them you can redo.
  • , so writing is a big deal.
  • Do the work and you will pass.

Theme 3

📚

  • Show up to all of the and make a and you will get an A.
  • and .
  • being late serious.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Fourteen reviews across several years provide detailed but conflicting evidence, making the overall pattern credible and polarizing.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 55
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ENGL1015 reviews
ENG1014 reviews
ENG1023 reviews
ENG0021 review
ENG0951 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 2 · A 4 · A- 2

B range

3

B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 2