AI Rate Professor

English

Christie Firtha

ENGL102 · ENG102 · ENGL101 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
40%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

if you can handle heavy writing, proactive communication, and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough Essay GraderReading HeavyVague InstructionsExtra Credit AvailableSupportive When Contacted
  • Students consistently call her a and essay work.
  • The course content is not seen as hard, but and .
  • Reviews split sharply between students who value her support and students who found her vague or unorganized.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Many students earned A grades, but comments say the A requires staying , and avoiding missed assignments.

Online evidence shows high effort despite A outcomes, while the conclusion.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Students say English 101 and 102 are not inherently hard, but the content itself.

Online reviews provide most of the evidence; and writing load rather than harder concepts.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews mention participation and discussion work, but they do not clearly prove a .

Online reviews emphasize weekly participation, while in-person reviews .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Recommendation depends on the student, because supportive and caring reviews are balanced , and organization.

Online reviews are strongly divided, and the and a warning.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Students repeatedly call her a are available.

Format shift

Online and evidence much stronger due to volume.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

The workload is heavy because reviews mention lots of , and multiple essays.

Format shift

Online reviews clearly show heavy weekly work, while .

Teaching experience

Poor

43/100

Teaching quality is inconsistent, with some students praising compassion and support while others , and poor organization.

Format shift

Online reviews are polarized, and the .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Assessment appears driven mainly by essays, discussions, journals, readings, and .

Format shift

Online reviews mention essays, quizzes, discussions, journals, a midterm, and a final, while and readings.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person evidence is mixed, with one strong accommodation-focused review and and readings.

Main concern

The and lots of reading.

What students said

“I would enthusiastically enroll in more of her courses if given the . Firtha.”
ENGL102
“She is a A in English”
ENGL102
“There are a LOT of readings”
ENGL102

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are polarized, with some students praising her support and while others criticize vague directions, little feedback, and .

Main concern

Online students most often complain about vague assignment descriptions and .

What students said

“ ”
ENGL101
“Very paper and reading heavy.”
ENGL102
“I got an A, but I had to work really hard and you definitely can't miss or .”
ENGL101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and a final, but they do not clearly prove open-book rules, proctoring, webcam use, or .

Quizzes MentionedMidterm MentionedFinal MentionedExam Policy Unclear

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

, and a final but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policies.

Quizzes MentionedMidterm MentionedFinal MentionedPolicy Not Clearly Proven
“Online class was 5 essays and 1 quiz, journal (easy summary), and .”
ENG102
“ .”
ENG102

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I got an A, but I had to work really hard and you definitely can't miss or .”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

43/100

“ .”

⚖️

28/100

“ .”

👍 Recommendation Split

45/100

“If you .”

Theme 1

📝 About Workload

  • Very paper and reading heavy.
  • A LOT of reading and essay writing.
  • There are a LOT of readings

Theme 2

⚖️ About Grades

  • She is a .
  • discussions if you don't write enough.
  • She is a A in English

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • Dr. Christie Firtha accommodates students with any learning disability, and she goes above and beyond when it comes to helping disabled students learn the material.
  • This teacher is a but, she offers to help you with your work if you reach out to her.
  • Communication is key with her.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 10 reviews span several years, include detailed workload and grading comments, and show consistent concerns despite mixed opinions.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 55

Course coverage

ENGL1024 reviews
ENG1023 reviews
ENGL1013 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

6

A 6

B range

4

B+ 4

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values